On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:09:19PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Those versions are recent enough. Try Wayne Davison's nohang patch at
http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rsync-nohang.patch
I just applied the patch and recompiled. No change in results.
Presumably the transfer is hanging for a
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
I've applied your simple nohang patch.
Cool. That's the one that affects the most people.
Instead we need a way of reproducing the bug and see if we can find a
solution without a buffer.
You can minimize the buffer usage by applying my move-files
On Monday, June 25, 2001 03:17:18 PM -0400 Kovalev, Ivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+--
| I am doing a poor man cluster using rsync to synchronize content of 2
| servers each of which has its own directly attached storage. Since it is a
| cluster (load balancer on top of these 2 servers), new
On 30 Jul 2001, J.Saravanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
bash$ rsync -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]::test test
Password:
@ERROR: auth failed on module test
I did try this command, But the result is same as you can see above..
Any other suggestion?..
What is in the server error log now?
--
On 25 Jun 2001, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if the protocol should be updated to avoid ever
assuming that an EOF on the socket was OK. The only case I know of
where this allowed is when we're listing modules from an rsync server.
If we modified the protocol to have
No, you misunderstood him: he meant that --delete would delete things, not
the lack of it. Of course if that's what you want then you need to put it
in.
Yes, your command line should work. Note, however, that when copying
between two filesystems mounted on the local machine, people have seen
Yes, that sounds like a pretty good plan for (say) rsync 3.0. We all
seem to be more or less on the same track as to how the protocol
should look.
Here are my feelings about the way to get there. I would be happy to
have holes picked in them:
* rsync 2.x works well, but is too crufty to be a
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
see if we can find a solution without a buffer.
Here's a solution with a non-growing buffer. This code keeps the
receiver-generator pipe clear by reading the ints and setting redo
flags in a character array (of flist-count elements). I'm avoiding
How can I setup rsync to do a comparison between two folders or servers and
then place the files that have differences in a seperate folder?
(..a folder other than the two I am comparing, need this for versioning
purposes...)
All suggestions welcome!!
Ned Alcorn
Sr. Systems Analyst
Continental
Hi,
I am looking for multi-rsync to transfer files
from a master machines to several other machines at the
same time. (ie. using broadcast mechanism.)
rsync does not have this capability at this moment.
(1) Is the next release going to include this capability?
If yes, when is it
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 12:30:24AM -0400, HP Wei wrote:
I am looking for multi-rsync to transfer files
from a master machines to several other machines at the
same time. (ie. using broadcast mechanism.)
The rsync+ patch may help here. I updated it to apply against rsync version
2.4.6 and
11 matches
Mail list logo
