Brian,
On 2017-03-21 07:35, Brian K. White via rsync wrote:
Any possibility of a version of rsync that doesn't need RSH or SSH?
rsync already doesn't need rsh or ssh.
* On host A (server, with room to accept big uploads):
Edit /etc/rsyncd.conf, add this to the end:
[hostb]
path = /s
Any possibility of a version of rsync that doesn't need RSH or SSH?
rsync already doesn't need rsh or ssh.
* On host A (server, with room to accept big uploads):
Edit /etc/rsyncd.conf, add this to the end:
[hostb]
path = /srv/rsync/hostb
auth users = hostb
Edit /etc/rsyncd.s
Kevin,
I know a KK - I have talked to him about Sydney Futurists stuff and
politics etc . . different email address though . .
See inline comments:
On 2017-03-14 16:17, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote:
Rsh should be pretty easy to do. I don't think it has changed since
before RH5.2 vintage.
Rsh should be pretty easy to do. I don't think it has changed since
before RH5.2 vintage.
Otherwise, your best bet would be NFS. I think RH5.2 is new enough for
NFSv3 but I don't remember for sure.
Alternatively maybe you know someone with a newer SCSI controller. I
have several PCI ones
People,
This doesn't seem possible - would it be possible to hack a version of
rsync to do it?
As an exercise, I want to create a VM image (or at least backup of all
the files with rsync) from a SCSI drive in an old Red Hat (NOT
Enterprise) v5.2 Linux 486 machine (circa 1999 that does have r