Re: Gzip

Julian wrote: > My assumption was based entirely on the fact that: > on the win32 version from gzip.org , the command > "gzip -h" shows the --rsyncable option available, and it works. > From what you say it seems this does not apply to the sources. If you download the sources for

Re: Gzip

My assumption was based entirely on the fact that: on the win32 version from gzip.org, the command "gzip -h" shows the --rsyncable option available, and it works. >From what you say it seems this does not apply to the sources. In any case, patch or no patch, any reason why not to upgrade? 2008/5

Re: --delete not actually deleting with encrypted names.

Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > $ rsyncrypto --trim=1 --ne-nesting=5 --name-encrypt=filemap --delete -c -v -r > a a.enc a.keys backup.crt > Delete 5974EC4026990DE16FAD43681769DC72 (b/c/bar) > $ find a.enc -name 5974EC4026990DE16FAD43681769DC72 -ls > 123596394 -rw-r--r-- 1 rlpowell users

Re: Gzip

Julian wrote: > Thanks for 1.07. > The latest gzip version is 1.3.12, and seems to come with rsyncable > patch as standard. Does it??? > Can I assume it's safe to just go ahead and use this with rsyncrypto? I tried this: > gzip-1.3.12$ rgrep rsync . > ./ChangeLog:* TODO: Add rsync patch. > ./T