Re: [rt-users] General permissions question

2010-10-25 Thread Josh Narins
://www.seniorbridge.com/images/seniorbridgedisclaimerTAG.gif] From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Crocker Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 12:50 PM To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] General

[rt-users] General permissions question

2010-10-22 Thread Josh Narins
I have three classes of users, I'm wondering if my privileges/groups setup is what RT intends. Class 1: Administrators. These three people can do anything. Class 2: People who log into RT and own and resolve tickets. Each is only going to be working with 1-3 queues out of 10-15 queues total.

Re: [rt-users] General permissions question

2010-10-22 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Fri 22.Oct'10 at 9:34:40 -0400, Josh Narins wrote: I have three classes of users, I'm wondering if my privileges/groups setup is what RT intends. Class 1: Administrators. These three people can do anything. Class 2: People who log into RT and own and resolve tickets. Each is only

Re: [rt-users] General permissions question

2010-10-22 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:03:07AM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote: On Fri 22.Oct'10 at 9:34:40 -0400, Josh Narins wrote: Class 3 won't be users which are seen via Configuration-Users. I still haven't figured out if they count as Everybody or Unprivileged. I'd like them to be

Re: [rt-users] General permissions question

2010-10-22 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Josh, We never grant rights to individual users, too much maintenance. I agree with Jesse (DUH!) to create a SuperUSer Group like System Admins, then another called Technical Support. I'd set rights as follows: Global System Rights: - Privileged: - CreateOwnDashboard -