Has anyone tried running RT in a virtual machine?
yes, we also have a ready to run virtual appliance,
See http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/RT_Request_Tracker
But this virtual appliance runs on Proxmox VE (means OpenVZ is used as
virtualization technology).
I am working also with vmware since
Martin Maurer wrote:
Has anyone tried running RT in a virtual machine?
yes, we also have a ready to run virtual appliance,
See http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/RT_Request_Tracker
snip
I am working also with vmware since years (and also other virtualizations
technologies) and the biggest issue
Mike Peachey schrieb:
Martin Maurer wrote:
Has anyone tried running RT in a virtual machine?
yes, we also have a ready to run virtual appliance,
See http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/RT_Request_Tracker
snip
I am working also with vmware since years (and also other
I don't know about anyone else, but I am getting a little uncomfortable
with your posts (to RT-Users and to the Wiki) being little more than an
advert for proxmox rather than a real contribution to the community.
Hi Mike,
Someone asked about experiences from others, I posted mine - I am
-Original Message-
From: Mike Peachey [mailto:mike.peac...@jennic.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009 12:29
To: Martin Maurer
Cc: Tim Cutts; RT Users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Hardware Config
Martin Maurer wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I am getting a little
I've been following this discussion (rather belatedly) with some
interest. One thing I haven't heard anyone discuss yet:
Has anyone tried running RT in a virtual machine? I'm about to move
our RT 3.4.2 server onto a virtual machine. I've configured the RT VM
to be actually really quite
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 21:55 +, Tim Cutts wrote:
I've been following this discussion (rather belatedly) with some
interest. One thing I haven't heard anyone discuss yet:
Has anyone tried running RT in a virtual machine?
Our current production system is a VM. It currently is configured
or
the system, 3.8.2 is screaming along for us.
--
Cass
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Tim Cutts
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:56 PM
To: RT Users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Hardware Config
I've been
Jesse Vincent wrote:
I agree completely with the above, but more important to me than just RAM
and processing power is the speed of disk access. He mentioned using RAID
5 in a follow-up post. That's fine, but are these IDE or 15k SCSI drives?
Faster drives should always speed up database
We presently have our RT installation running on the same hardware as the
database: an Intel 1550 box with 4 cores of about 2.5GHz each and 8GB RAM.
We've been plagued with speed issues even after upgrading to this. We realized
initial performance gains when we installed to the new hardware
cc
al.com
Subject
[rt-users] Hardware Config
01/16/2009 01:37
[rt-users] Hardware Config
01/16/2009 01:37
PM
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:37:30PM -0500, Mathew wrote:
We presently have our RT installation running on the same hardware as the
database: an Intel 1550 box with 4 cores of about 2.5GHz each and 8GB RAM.
We've been plagued with speed issues even after upgrading to this. We
realized
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:37:30PM -0500, Mathew wrote:
We presently have our RT installation running on the same hardware as
the database: an Intel 1550 box with 4 cores of about 2.5GHz each and 8GB
RAM. We've been plagued with speed issues even after upgrading to this.
We realized initial
I agree completely with the above, but more important to me than just RAM
and processing power is the speed of disk access. He mentioned using RAID
5 in a follow-up post. That's fine, but are these IDE or 15k SCSI drives?
Faster drives should always speed up database performance.
At 8
I absolutely agree. I've already told him that new hardware isn't going to
make a difference even before asking about it here. However, in order to be
able to cover my bases in proving him wrong (admittedly a task I chomp at the
bit for) I decided to ask about it here.
I don't have direct
I don't have the exact specs but I know they are SCSI and likely 10k. I don't
know the seek times though.
jmose...@corp.xanadoo.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:37:30PM -0500, Mathew wrote:
We presently have our RT installation running on the same hardware as
the database: an
Can I sob quietly into a hard drink just for the sake of having the drink?
Jesse Vincent wrote:
I agree completely with the above, but more important to me than just RAM
and processing power is the speed of disk access. He mentioned using RAID
5 in a follow-up post. That's fine, but are
I don't have direct access to the my.cnf file as I'm only a consultant these
days but once I'm able to get that I'll give some more info.
As also mentioned, I still need to take a look at the tuning scrip Ruslan
pointed me to.
Start with that script. It just queries the database. It
Jesse Vincent wrote:
I agree completely with the above, but more important to me than just RAM
and processing power is the speed of disk access. He mentioned using RAID
5 in a follow-up post. That's fine, but are these IDE or 15k SCSI drives?
Faster drives should always speed up database
Jesse Vincent je...@bestpractical.com wrote:
At 8 gigs of RAM on a well-tuned system, most of what RT is pulling out
of the database should always be cached in memory. If MySQL is going to
disk on every query, the game's over and you're better off sobbing
quietly into a stiff drink than
I'm definitely not an expert on how mysql utilizes system memory, but on
32-bit Linux systems, isn't the max amount of memory a single process can
use 2 GB?
There are (fairly standard) patches to the kernel to remove that limit.
And there are known issues with mysql on 32 bit linux and
Curtis Bruneau wrote:
Jesse Vincent wrote:
I agree completely with the above, but more important to me than just RAM
and processing power is the speed of disk access. He mentioned using RAID
5 in a follow-up post. That's fine, but are these IDE or 15k SCSI drives?
Faster drives should
Fair enough.
James Moseley
Jesse Vincent
je...@bestpracti
cal.com
I was finally able to log into the system I'm consulting on. Using all of this
discussion as a jumping off point to figure out other steps to take I've found
a couple things which are clear problems. There are only 4GB RAM as opposed to
the 8GB which I thought it had. This would be moot
je...@bestpractical.com
Cc: RT Users rt-us...@bestpractical.com
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Hardware Config
I was finally able to log into the system I'm consulting on. Using all of
this discussion as a jumping off point to figure out other steps to take
I've
26 matches
Mail list logo
