Re: [rt-users] Order of multiple transactions in request

2016-03-19 Thread Jim Brandt
On 3/14/16 7:29 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Marcos Orallo wrote: https://metacpan.org/pod/RT::Extension::AjaxPreviewScrips I understand this was integrated into 4.4 core? @BPS, Can you confirm the merge of AjaxPreviewScrips in 4.4? Yes,

Re: [rt-users] Order of multiple transactions in request

2016-03-14 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Marcos Orallo wrote: >> https://metacpan.org/pod/RT::Extension::AjaxPreviewScrips > > I understand this was integrated into 4.4 core? @BPS, Can you confirm the merge of AjaxPreviewScrips in 4.4? -m - RT 4.4 and RTIR Training Sessions

Re: [rt-users] Order of multiple transactions in request

2016-03-14 Thread Marcos Orallo
Thanks Matt! El 14/3/2016 7:10 p. m., "Matt Zagrabelny" escribió: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:l > > > > The limitation of TxnBatch not updating the list of email recipients > > should be fixed in 4.4. Updating was in our

Re: [rt-users] Order of multiple transactions in request

2016-03-14 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Marcos Orallo wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to know what determines the order of creation when a request is >> translated into more than one transaction, and

Re: [rt-users] Order of multiple transactions in request

2016-03-14 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Marcos Orallo wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to know what determines the order of creation when a request is > translated into more than one transaction, and if this can be customized > somehow. > > My use case: I want to add a tag

[rt-users] Order of multiple transactions in request

2016-03-14 Thread Marcos Orallo
Hi all, I would like to know what determines the order of creation when a request is translated into more than one transaction, and if this can be customized somehow. My use case: I want to add a tag [Resolved] to the subject of the resolving comment *and only that*. >From what I've seen, the