[rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread testwreq wreq
* I have managed to get it all set up and RT running OK with named virtual host over http. However, I am having problems with getting them to work over https. When I set a virtual host name, it always serves the first listed domain. See settings below. https:firstone serves the correct folder, but

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Curtis Bruneau
Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the reasoning is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as apache would. The only other way would be to have them on different ports but then you'd have to specify the port when going to the site. testwreq wreq wrote: * I

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread testwreq wreq
Actually, I should have mentioned before that our rt installation is on a different IP. On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Curtis Bruneau curt...@vianet.ca wrote: Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the reasoning is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Drew Barnes
Try naming the virtual hosts. *:443 means any domain that resolves to that machine will get the first one, since it matches. Curtis may also be right (never tried two https sites on the same box), but try having the first one be VirtualHost firstone:443 and the second one VirtualHost rt:443 and

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread testwreq wreq
I tried VirtualHost firstone:443 and the second one Virtual Host rt:443 but still https://rt.hostname.com goes to https;//firstone While restarting apache, the warning message now was: [Fri Aug 21 11:20:23 2009] [warn] VirtualHost firstname:443 overlaps with VirtualHost rt.hostname.com:443, the

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Jerrad Pierce
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:09, Curtis Bruneaucurt...@vianet.ca wrote: Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the reasoning is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as apache would. The only other way would be to have them on different ports but then you'd have to