Re: [rt-users] Query builder and multi-select custom fields

2009-01-27 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
There is a patch on rt3.fsck.com that needs testing:
http://rt3.fsck.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=8541#txn-77170

I'm not sure it applies to the latest 3.8

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Alex Young
alexyo...@scoutsolutions.co.uk wrote:
 Thanks, but that brings back hundreds of tickets, when we know the other
 query *should* bring back just the one ticket that has the CF set to
 those two values.

 Looking through the RT bug system, it looks like this is a known bug and
 is due to be fixed in 3.8.3.


 -Original Message-
 From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:kfcroc...@lbl.gov]
 Sent: 26 January 2009 18:40
 To: Alex Young
 Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Query builder and multi-select custom fields

 Alex,


Try changing the AND to OR between your two like
 conditions. Hope
 this helps.


 Kenn
 LBNL

 On 1/26/2009 7:04 AM, Alex Young wrote:
 I have a ticket in the Support queue that has both the 'External' and
 'Internal' client types in a custom multi-select field. When I run the

 following search:



 Queue = 'Support' AND 'CF.{Client}' LIKE 'Internal' AND 'CF.{Client}'
 LIKE 'Internal'



 I expected to get the ticket back, but instead I get 0 tickets. Is
 this
 valid behaviour from RT's perspective? Should I be searching in some
 other way to return the ticket when it has a CF set to two values?



 

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com




-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Query builder and multi-select custom fields

2009-01-27 Thread Alex Young
I attempted to run the patch but it failed. Looks like it won't work for 3.8.2

patching file lib/RT/Tickets_Overlay.pm
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1223 (offset 58 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1231 (offset 58 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1260 (offset 58 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1280 (offset 58 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1308 (offset 58 lines).
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1330.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1447 (offset 66 lines).
1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/RT/Tickets_Overlay.pm.rej


-Original Message-
From: Ruslan Zakirov [mailto:ruslan.zaki...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 27 January 2009 11:49
To: Alex Young
Cc: Kenneth Crocker; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Query builder and multi-select custom fields

There is a patch on rt3.fsck.com that needs testing:
http://rt3.fsck.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=8541#txn-77170

I'm not sure it applies to the latest 3.8

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Alex Young
alexyo...@scoutsolutions.co.uk wrote:
 Thanks, but that brings back hundreds of tickets, when we know the other
 query *should* bring back just the one ticket that has the CF set to
 those two values.

 Looking through the RT bug system, it looks like this is a known bug and
 is due to be fixed in 3.8.3.


 -Original Message-
 From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:kfcroc...@lbl.gov]
 Sent: 26 January 2009 18:40
 To: Alex Young
 Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Query builder and multi-select custom fields

 Alex,


Try changing the AND to OR between your two like
 conditions. Hope
 this helps.


 Kenn
 LBNL

 On 1/26/2009 7:04 AM, Alex Young wrote:
 I have a ticket in the Support queue that has both the 'External' and
 'Internal' client types in a custom multi-select field. When I run the

 following search:



 Queue = 'Support' AND 'CF.{Client}' LIKE 'Internal' AND 'CF.{Client}'
 LIKE 'Internal'



 I expected to get the ticket back, but instead I get 0 tickets. Is
 this
 valid behaviour from RT's perspective? Should I be searching in some
 other way to return the ticket when it has a CF set to two values?



 

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com




-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


[rt-users] Query builder and multi-select custom fields

2009-01-26 Thread Alex Young
I have a ticket in the Support queue that has both the 'External' and
'Internal' client types in a custom multi-select field. When I run the
following search:

 

Queue = 'Support' AND 'CF.{Client}' LIKE 'Internal' AND 'CF.{Client}'
LIKE 'Internal'

 

I expected to get the ticket back, but instead I get 0 tickets. Is this
valid behaviour from RT's perspective? Should I be searching in some
other way to return the ticket when it has a CF set to two values? 

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com