Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Wes Modes
Paul, sounds like you aren't a long term fan of Fedora, RHEL, or CentOS, so I'm guessing yum feels like an inconvenience to you, especially when it seems to be getting in the way of your desired install. I've been a sysadmin for 20 years and I've never been a fan of the make 'n' break style of

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Gary Greene
Agreed. This is why I spent a week with cpan2rpm and built packages for both openSuSE (which we're transitioning to) and CentOS. On 3/11/10 11:21 AM, Wes Modes wmo...@ucsc.edu wrote: Paul, sounds like you aren't a long term fan of Fedora, RHEL, or CentOS, so I'm guessing yum feels like an

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Darin Perusich
-Original Message- From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users- boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Gary Greene Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:52 PM To: Wes Modes; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Wes Modes
I presume that is CentOS5. That would make me very happy as CentOS RPMs should work for RHEL. One thing I adore about well-built packages is that things are placed in the right location for the OS. For instance, the RT3 rpms put all the config files in /etc, all the perl modules in the perl

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Gary Greene
The CentOS ones follow the RH way of directory layout, with the caveat that I chose to put the other modules that normally get pulled in via cpan in the perl5 site_lib hierarchy to assure that a rouge update from rpmforge or upstream CentOS would be able to be installed without odd file conflicts.

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Wes Modes
That is nice to see that you made a well-crafted rpm that you can be proud of. I wonder what would happen if a later version of RT3 became available via EPEL. Would it nicely replace the files (maybe moving stuff to rpmsave's) or would all hell break loose? What RT3 version is your centos rpm

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-03 Thread Gary Greene
The CentOS version is currently 3.8.1, so they're not really a good fit at this time. The SuSE ones are 3.8.8. If you're still interested in them, I can put them on a server outside my office for download (bandwidth at work is lacking.) Far as I know, the changes in /etc are marked config

[rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-02 Thread Wes Modes
Hello, I have been struggling with attempts to install RT3.8 via RPMs. I know it is perfectly possible to install RT3.8 using the BP install scripts and docs, but I'd prefer to do it through yum for system sustainability, ease of updates and upgrades, etc. These instructions show how to set up

Re: [rt-users] Frustrating attempts to install RT3.8 from RPM

2010-11-02 Thread Paul
On 11/02/2010 02:19 PM, Wes Modes wrote: Hello, I have been struggling with attempts to install RT3.8 via RPMs. I know it is perfectly possible to install RT3.8 using the BP install scripts and docs, but I'd prefer to do it through yum for system sustainability, ease of updates and