Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Ronald J. Yacketta
On 2/3/2012 10:36 AM, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote: Hello all! We went live with rt 4.0.04 last night and have been getting reports of end-users being unable to change ticket status in ANY queue from New - Open. Ticket 39927: Status 'open' isn't a valid status for tickets in this queue. We

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Ronald J. Yacketta
On 2/3/2012 11:37 AM, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote: On 2/3/2012 10:36 AM, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote: Hello all! We went live with rt 4.0.04 last night and have been getting reports of end-users being unable to change ticket status in ANY queue from New - Open. Ticket 39927: Status 'open' isn't

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:36:07AM -0500, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote: Hello all! We went live with rt 4.0.04 last night and have been getting reports of end-users being unable to change ticket status in ANY queue from New - Open. Ticket 39927: Status 'open' isn't a valid status

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Ronald J Yacketta
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:36:07AM -0500, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote: Hello all! We went live with rt 4.0.04 last night and have been getting reports of end-users being unable to change ticket status in ANY queue from New - Open. Ticket 39927: Status 'open' isn't a valid status

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:42:47PM -0500, Ronald J Yacketta wrote: On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:36:07AM -0500, Ronald J. Yacketta wrote: Hello all! We went live with rt 4.0.04 last night and have been getting reports of end-users being unable to change ticket status in ANY

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Jeff Blaine
You really want all local configs in RT_SiteConfig.pm, not RT_Config.pm. Next time you upgrade, any changes to RT_Config.pm will be blown away. Why doesn't Best Practical just do away this idea? 1. make install put new RT_Config.pm in place make a new 'RT_SiteConfig' help document

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:34:52PM -0500, Jeff Blaine wrote: You really want all local configs in RT_SiteConfig.pm, not RT_Config.pm. Next time you upgrade, any changes to RT_Config.pm will be blown away. Why doesn't Best Practical just do away this idea? 1. make install put new

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Jeff Blaine
Because having an RT_SiteConfig.pm that is the same as RT_Config.pm means that RT can never tell you if you overrode the setting. Sure it can. In those rare needs, the code can just compare the value in RT_Config.pm to the one in RT_SiteConfig.pm. If they're the same, it was not overridden.

Re: [rt-users] [rt 4.0.4] Unable to change status from New - Open

2012-02-03 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:21:22PM -0500, Jeff Blaine wrote: Because having an RT_SiteConfig.pm that is the same as RT_Config.pm means that RT can never tell you if you overrode the setting. Sure it can. In those rare needs, the code can just compare the value in RT_Config.pm to the one in