Hi Jeff and Reshad,
From my personal perspective, I don't think we should require BFD for VxLAN to
support Echo mode, because as I know, although the final standard is still on
the way, many vendors including my company have already implemented BFD for
VxLAN, and it seems that works fine,
As author, I support all three drafts.
On Sep 10, 2019, at 7:13 PM, Manav Bhatia
mailto:manavbha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I support all 3 documents.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:45 PM Jeffrey Haas
mailto:jh...@pfrc.org>> wrote:
Working Group,
As we discussed in Montreal at IETF-105, the last hang
Hi Reshad,
I support this draft to be published, it provides a simple and elegant
extension for BFD to verify path MTU.
By the way, if further we'd like to achieve a fine-grained process control
while using BFD to verfiy or detect path MTU, with the cost of a more complex
extention to
I support all 3 documents.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:45 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> As we discussed in Montreal at IETF-105, the last hang up on progressing
> the
> authentication documents (thread copied below) was concerns on the IPR
> against them.
>
> The holder of the IPR
Hi Jeff,
I would like to point out that there are three drafts that we are doing LC on,
whereas the IPR is only on the authentication draft. While I would like to see
all three drafts advance, I would hate to see IPR as the reason why none of
them advance.
The reason for advocating the
Hello, Greg,
Although there is no question in your message, let me reply with a different
perspective.
I find the creation of an Operational Considerations self-contained section to
be a misguided approach, since this whole document should largely concern
itself with operational
[trimming headers]
Working Group,
While we're suspecting everyone is finishing up holidays, please take until
the end of this week to answer Reshad's question: Should we require BFD for
vxlan to support Echo mode?
-- Jeff
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:41:46PM +, Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Working Group,
This last call period is set to expire at the end of the week.
Please respond whether you believe these documents SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be
advanced for publication.
-- Jeff
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:17:18AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> As we discussed in
