Hi Greg,
Please see inline.
Original
From: GregMirsky
To: Ketan Talaulikar ;
Cc: 肖敏10093570;rtg-bfd WG
;draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-e...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2023年09月27日 02:21
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-08
Hi Ketan,
Thank you for sharing your interpretation of
Hi Ketan,
Thank you for sharing your interpretation of the introduced text. I agree
that your view is in line with how the scope of BFD is defined in RFC 5880:
protocol intended to detect faults in the
bidirectional path between two forwarding engines, including
interfaces, data link(s),
Hi Greg,
I would read it as " ... the liveness of a node over the specific interface
..." i.e, the node is reachable and responding over that interface.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:16 PM Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi,
> as I understand it, the update assigns to the Unaffiliated BFD a
Hi,
as I understand it, the update assigns to the Unaffiliated BFD a new
functionality, monitoring "the liveness of a node not including the
availability of a specific IP address at that node". In my opinion, that
raises some questions:
- What is "the liveness of a node"?
- When referring
Thanks Xiao Min - the update looks good and addresses my comments.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM wrote:
> Hi Ketan,
>
>
> Thank you for the suggested text, very helpful.
>
> I've just posted a new revision that incorporates all your comments. Link
> as below.
>
>
Hi Ketan,
Thank you for the suggested text, very helpful.
I've just posted a new revision that incorporates all your comments. Link as
below.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-09
Please see inline with [XM-2]>>>.
Original
From: KetanTalaulikar
To:
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-09.txt is now available. It is
a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) WG of the IETF.
Title: Unaffiliated BFD Echo
Authors: Weiqiang Cheng
Ruixue Wang
Xiao Min
Reshad Rahman
