RE: Submitted ROSA gap analysis and arch drafts - avoiding DNS?

2023-06-30 Thread Dirk Trossen
- From: Joel Halpern Sent: 29 June 2023 20:19 To: Dirk Trossen ; RTGWG Cc: r...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Submitted ROSA gap analysis and arch drafts - avoiding DNS? One of the arguments made in these documents seems to be that by using this technology you can reduce latency by skipping the DNS step

Re: Submitted ROSA gap analysis and arch drafts - avoiding DNS?

2023-06-29 Thread Mark Smith
On Fri, 30 June 2023, 04:19 Joel Halpern, wrote: > One of the arguments made in these documents seems to be that by using > this technology you can reduce latency by skipping the DNS step. > > I do not see how that works. Are you assuming that applications will > have the anycast address for a

Re: Submitted ROSA gap analysis and arch drafts - avoiding DNS?

2023-06-29 Thread Joel Halpern
One of the arguments made in these documents seems to be that by using this technology you can reduce latency by skipping the DNS step. I do not see how that works.  Are you assuming that applications will have the anycast address for a given service hard coded?  And that all operators