t: 09 August 2017 17:07
To: Sikhivahan Gundu <sikhivahan.gu...@ericsson.com>; Chris Bowers
<cbow...@juniper.net>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-de...@tools.ietf.org; RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: shepherd feedback and idnits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-05.txt
Hi,
Thanks
: RE: shepherd feedback and idnits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-05.txt
Hi,
Requesting a couple of clarifications.
>> If a new convergence occurs while ULOOP_DELAY_DOWN_TIMER is running,
>> ULOOP_DELAY_DOWN_TIMER is stopped
Do we stop the timer if "new convergence" is
-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-de...@tools.ietf.org; RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: shepherd feedback and idnits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-05.txt
Thanks Chris, I will post a new revision with those changes.
From: Chris Bowers [mailto:cbow...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 16:0
>>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>;
draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-de...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-de...@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: shepherd feedback and idnits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-05.txt
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the review. I'm u
RE: shepherd feedback and idnits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-05.txt
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the review. I'm updating the document to reflect your proposals.
Couple of comments:
- s/"otherwise the standard IP convergence MUST be used."/ "otherwise
the standard IP conv
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the review. I'm updating the document to reflect your proposals.
Couple of comments:
- s/"otherwise the standard IP convergence MUST be used."/ "otherwise
the standard IP convergence MUST used". It does not sound good to me but may be
because of an English grammar
