Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27

Hi Linda, Please see my replies inline. -thanks! From: Linda Dunbar Date: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:01 PM To: Aseem Choudhary , draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement.auth...@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27 Aseem, Thank

Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27

Hi Linda, Thanks for organizing the call. The changes look good. Best, Aseem From: Linda Dunbar Date: Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 4:16 PM To: Aseem Choudhary , draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement.auth...@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud

Re: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-00

. Best, Aseem From: Kausik Majumdar Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 9:47 AM To: Linda Dunbar , Aseem Choudhary , draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan.auth...@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-00 Hi Aseem, Sorry for the late response. In addition to what

Re: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-00

Hi Kausik, Yes, looks good! Also, consider some text for header authentication. Best, Aseem From: Kausik Majumdar Date: Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:54 PM To: Aseem Choudhary , Linda Dunbar , draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan.auth...@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-dmk-rtgwg

Re: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-00

links offline. Happy to have more discussions in the IETF. Thanks, Kausik From: Shihang(Vincent) Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 1:29 AM To: Kausik Majumdar ; Linda Dunbar ; Aseem Choudhary ; draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan.auth...@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: draft

Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27

Thanks Linda, the suggested resolution looks good! Aseem From: Linda Dunbar Date: Friday, July 28, 2023 at 11:22 AM To: Aseem Choudhary , draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement.auth...@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27 Aseem

draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27

Hello Authors, Thanks for the writing the document! After going through it, I have some questions/comments: 1. Section 5: Heading looks something miss to me since main heading mentions “method to scale ..” while sub-sections mention “issues.. “, “poor performance ..”. Maybe it can be

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IPR call for draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan

Hi Yingzhen, As a co-author, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this Draft. Thanks, Aseem From: Kausik Majumdar Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2024 3:23 PM To: Yingzhen Qu Cc: RTGWG

Re: To authors of draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model; draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-oper-model

Hi Jeff, Attached are the slides. -thanks, Aseem From: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com>> Date: Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 5:31 PM To: RTGWG mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-mo...@ietf.org"

Re: Comment on draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-03

Hi Ruediger, Thanks for your comments. We are looking into adding support for buffer/burst in ms and percentages for rate. Also, I have forwarded the draft to TSVWG and will follow up for any comment/suggestion. Regards, Aseem From:

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Hi Greg, Please find replies inline. Regards, Aseem From: Greg Mirsky Date: Monday, December 3, 2018 at 5:33 PM To: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" Cc: Jeff Tantsura , rtgwg-chairs , RTGWG Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07 Hi Aseem, much appre

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Hi Greg, Thanks for your question. This draft defines the QoS base modules of Policy, Classiier, Action, Target. QoS base module has been augmented with Diffserv module. This is described in Section 1. For MPLS, similar modules will be augmented as part of separate draft. This has not been

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Hi Fred, Thanks for your comments. Please see replies inline. Regards, Aseem. On 12/1/18, 12:33 PM, "rtgwg on behalf of Fred Baker" wrote: > On Dec 1, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Dear Authors, > thank you for taking on this work. I have a question

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Ahh.. got it. This is company C example (Section: Example of Company C Diffserv Model). It is just an example to indicate how to append the model for each vendor requirements. Best Regards, Aseem On 12/3/18, 10:40 AM, "Fred Baker" wrote: > On Dec 2, 2018, at 8

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

for separate YANG modules. Look, for example, at draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg to see a single module encompassing several aspects of one protocol. Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" To: "tom petch" ; &qu

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Hi Tom, Thanks for the comments. Please see some comments inline. Regards, Aseem On 12/4/18, 3:09 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of tom petch" wrote: Viewed as a YANG module, there are a number of defects in this I-D. I think that the flavour is well illustrated by: - s.5 This

Re: The RTGWG WG has placed draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi Tom, Jeff, We will be working on it before IETF105. -thanks, Aseem From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:40 PM To: "rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org" , "draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-mo...@ietf.org" , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , tom petch Subject: Re: The RTGWG WG has placed

Re: [EXT] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03

Hello Jurgen, Sorry for the delayed response. Please find the comments inline with prefix [A] We are updating the draft based on these comments. Regards, Aseem From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" mailto:asech...@cisco.com>> Date: Sunday, May 2, 2021 at 11:08 PM To: "

Re: [EXT] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03

Hello Jurgen, Thanks for your comments. We will address these comments and update the draft. Regards, Aseem From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 6:27:33 AM To: yang-doct...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model@ietf.org ; last-c...@ietf.org ;

Re: IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. -thanks, Aseem From: Yingzhen Qu Date: Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 10:30 AM To: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-mo...@ietf.org" , routing WG Cc: rtgwg-chairs Subject: IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model Resent-From: Resent-To: , , , ,

Re: [EXT] IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model

Hi Yiingzhen, I checked with Ebben and Norm Strahle. Ebben has already replied. Norm has retired and no longer will work further on the document. Please advise for the next steps. Best, Aseem From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" Date: Monday, September 27, 2021 at 4:47 PM To: Yingzhe

Re: [EXT] IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model

Hi Yingzhen, Ok, I am reaching out. Best, Aseem From: Yingzhen Qu Date: Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 8:55 PM To: "Dr. Helen Chen" , "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani , "draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-mo...@ietf.org" , routing WG , rtgwg-chair