[Rtk-users] Problems with --like and --dimension parameters of rtkforwardprojections and rtkfdk

Hi, My name is Anaïs, I’m a student in computer sciences, and I'm currently doing my internship, which consists partly to do a tomographic reconstruction. I use rtk to reconstruct my model, but I have problems when I use rtkforwardprojections and rtkfdk with –like or –dimension. Indeed, if I

Re: [Rtk-users] Problems with --like and --dimension parameters of rtkforwardprojections and rtkfdk

. Anaïs - Mail original - De: "Simon Rit" <simon@creatis.insa-lyon.fr> À: "anais capouillez" <anais.capouil...@student.uliege.be> Cc: rtk-users@public.kitware.com Envoyé: Lundi 29 Janvier 2018 12:33:20 Objet: Re: [Rtk-users] Problems with -

Re: [Rtk-users] Reducing the pattern of errors

ot; <simon@creatis.insa-lyon.fr> À: "anais capouillez" <anais.capouil...@student.uliege.be> Cc: rtk-users@public.kitware.com Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Février 2018 16:30:49 Objet: Re: [Rtk-users] Reducing the pattern of errors Hi, These are numerical errors. How did you create the pro

[Rtk-users] More errors with 360 projections than 180 for SART

Hi, I'm reconstructing a homogeneous cylinder. My problem is that I have better results for 180 projections, than for 360 for SART (with default parameters), and the same geometry (except the number of projections). I don't understand why adding projections adds more errors, since it should be

Re: [Rtk-users] More errors with 360 projections than 180 for SART

Hi, Thank you, this is probably the reason. Anaïs - Mail original - De: "Simon Rit" <simon@creatis.insa-lyon.fr> À: "Chao Wu" <wucha...@gmail.com> Cc: "anais capouillez" <anais.capouil...@student.uliege.be>, "rtk-users" <