Gireesha Rao schrieb:
> Hi All,
>
> Absolutely new to RTAI and RTNet. I would like to know whether I can use
> these really promising technologies to address my project requirement.
>
> My problem statement is this:
> I have Linux box with 3 e1000 ports. One of them is connected to a hardware
> d
> > > Ok, it seems that wireshark is overloaded.
> >
> > Try capturing offline, eg. with tcpdump into a file.
>
> Ok, I will install tcpdump and test it.
>
> > > No suspicious kernel error message.
> > > No packets are dropped neither in receiving nor sending box.
> > > BTW, for both, only RX p
> > Ok, it seems that wireshark is overloaded.
>
> Try capturing offline, eg. with tcpdump into a file.
Ok, I will install tcpdump and test it.
> > No suspicious kernel error message.
> > No packets are dropped neither in receiving nor sending box.
> > BTW, for both, only RX packets counter inc
RAKOTOSALAMA, Nirilanto wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> =20
>>> In order to test rtcap+wireshark perf to see if it could
>> analize a full=
>> loaded traffic,
>>> I ran a simple program that sends n UDP packets of 1 kBytes
>> from a box =
>> (xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ e1000)
>>> to another (xenomai 2.3.
> > Hello,
> >=20
> > In order to test rtcap+wireshark perf to see if it could
> analize a full=
> loaded traffic,
> > I ran a simple program that sends n UDP packets of 1 kBytes
> from a box =
> (xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ e1000)
> > to another (xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ eepro100 + rtcap +
RAKOTOSALAMA, Nirilanto wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> In order to test rtcap+wireshark perf to see if it could analize a full=
loaded traffic,
> I ran a simple program that sends n UDP packets of 1 kBytes from a box =
(xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ e1000)
> to another (xenomai 2.3.1+ rtnet 0.9.9+ eepro100
6 matches
Mail list logo
