If it's preferable, can someone take a look at all my proposed rubygem
packages? Although I managed to get most of them to build using the developer's
testing methods. If it's easy to switch them to use RSpec 2.x, by just
adjusting dependency and using rspec instead of rake for test validation I
then I am getting conflicting views since OpenNebula folks said they asked
upstream and they were told to use data_mapper?
if anything we would just patch OpenNebula to use 'datamapper' if we have to No
big deal.
- Original Message -
From: Marek Goldmann
To: Ruby SIG mailing list
Cc
Upstream has confirmed to me that data_mapper is the preferred name, as there
is also rubygem-data_objects.
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:04:32 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
Dne
So it seems extlib can be migrated to the RSpec 2.x quite easily. See
the attached patch.
Btw the package build fails later due to YARD documentation build using
Rake. I consider using of Rake as bad practice since Rakefiles are
usually too tightly integrated with developer setup, therefore ca
I have created upstream ticket for this:
http://datamapper.lighthouseapp.com/projects/20609-datamapper/tickets/1520
Vit
Dne 27.7.2011 10:05, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Probably, but its wrong anyway. For example sqlite3-ruby was renamed to
> sqlite3. Nevertheless if you try to install sqlite3-ruby
Probably, but its wrong anyway. For example sqlite3-ruby was renamed to
sqlite3. Nevertheless if you try to install sqlite3-ruby, it installs
sqlite3 anyway. Not sure how is that done, but it should be probably
reported upstream.
Vit
Dne 27.7.2011 09:53, Marek Goldmann napsal(a):
> Fun, I was
Fun, I was looking at the release notes for latest datamapper and it seems they
highlight "datamapper" over "data_mapper":
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-110-released.html
It looks like they used the "dash version" earlier:
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-10
Dne 27.7.2011 09:08, Marek Goldmann napsal(a):
> On 27 lip 2011, at 09:04, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, why you prefer "data_mapper" over "data mapper"?
> Good question, especially when upstream calls it "datamapper":
>
> https://rubygems.org/gems/datamapper
>
> --Marek
>
> __
On 27 lip 2011, at 09:04, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, why you prefer "data_mapper" over "data mapper"?
Good question, especially when upstream calls it "datamapper":
https://rubygems.org/gems/datamapper
--Marek
___
ruby-sig
Dne 26.7.2011 18:03, Shawn Starr napsal(a):
> Thanks, all my current SRPMs are here at
> http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora-work
Thank you.
> Note rubygem-datamapper is now rubygem-data_mapper so ignore the latter SRPM.
>
Just out of curiosity, why you prefer "data_mapper" over "datamapper"?
V
10 matches
Mail list logo
