- Original Message -
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
Dne 20.2.2012 13:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 02/20/2012 07:20 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 20.2.2012 12:45, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
Thank you. Unfortunately you do not solve how to migrate from
On 02/20/2012 04:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.2.2012 20:40, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 01/25/2012 04:46 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
Dne 20.2.2012 12:45, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 02/20/2012 04:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.2.2012 20:40, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 01/25/2012 04:46 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src
On 02/20/2012 07:20 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 20.2.2012 12:45, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 02/20/2012 04:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.2.2012 20:40, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 01/25/2012 04:46 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
$
Dne 20.2.2012 13:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 02/20/2012 07:20 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 20.2.2012 12:45, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
Thank you. Unfortunately you do not solve how to migrate from BR:
rubygem(rspec-core) back to BR: rubygem(rspec). The main issue is
that rubygem-rspec-core was patched
Hi guys,
It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
rubygem-ffi-0:1.0.9-2.fc16.src
rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.fc15.src
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
Dne 20.1.2012 22:55, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 01/12/2012 08:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
There have been nice progress in this matter, nevertheless, there are
still some packages which depends on RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
On 01/12/2012 08:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
There have been nice progress in this matter, nevertheless, there are
still some packages which depends on RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
deltacloud-core-0:0.4.1-6.fc17.src
Thank you. It seems that upstream version is using RSpec 2.x anyway, so
it should be straight forward.
Vit
Dne 12.1.2012 18:53, Michael Stahnke napsal(a):
Linode is in a FTBFS state anyway, due to some httparty changes.
When I am able to fix linode, it will require rspec 2.x.
On Thu, Jan
Dne 26.7.2011 18:03, Shawn Starr napsal(a):
Thanks, all my current SRPMs are here at
http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora-work
Thank you.
Note rubygem-datamapper is now rubygem-data_mapper so ignore the latter SRPM.
Just out of curiosity, why you prefer data_mapper over datamapper?
Vit
Probably, but its wrong anyway. For example sqlite3-ruby was renamed to
sqlite3. Nevertheless if you try to install sqlite3-ruby, it installs
sqlite3 anyway. Not sure how is that done, but it should be probably
reported upstream.
Vit
Dne 27.7.2011 09:53, Marek Goldmann napsal(a):
Fun, I was
So it seems extlib can be migrated to the RSpec 2.x quite easily. See
the attached patch.
Btw the package build fails later due to YARD documentation build using
Rake. I consider using of Rake as bad practice since Rakefiles are
usually too tightly integrated with developer setup, therefore
Upstream has confirmed to me that data_mapper is the preferred name, as there
is also rubygem-data_objects.
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:04:32 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec
For EPEL 6 - exactly 5:
$ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src
rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src
rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src
rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src
rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src
For EPEL 5 - also 5:
$
Mo Morsi wrote, at 07/15/2011 11:15 AM +9:00:
On 07/13/2011 02:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
Since February, there are available RSpec 2.x in Fedora repositories.
However, as of now, the main package rubygem-rspec was not migrated to
RSpec 2.x and still provides RSpec 1.3 functionality.
://docspace.corp.redhat.com/groups/itrb
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruchvondr...@redhat.com
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 8:36:08 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
The most differences are usually in spec_helper.rb if you are using one
16 matches
Mail list logo