Thank you. It seems that upstream version is using RSpec 2.x anyway, so
it should be straight forward.
Vit
Dne 12.1.2012 18:53, Michael Stahnke napsal(a):
Linode is in a FTBFS state anyway, due to some httparty changes.
When I am able to fix linode, it will require rspec 2.x.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Vít Ondruch<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi guys,
There have been nice progress in this matter, nevertheless, there are still
some packages which depends on RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
deltacloud-core-0:0.4.1-6.fc17.src (mfojtik, clalance)
jruby-0:1.6.2-2.fc16.src (mmorsi, vondruch)
rubygem-ffi-0:1.0.9-2.fc16.src (bkearney)
rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.fc15.src (stahnma)
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
aeolus-conductor-devel-0:0.4.0-1.fc17.noarch (mmorsi, clalance, sseago)
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires rubygem-rspec
rubygem-daemon_controller-0:0.2.6-1.fc16.src (pwu)
Vit
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
