Dne 24.12.2011 01:54, Michael Stahnke napsal(a):
Thanks for these rpms. I've been trying to get the 1.9.3 srpm to
rebuild onto EL6 and I've been having some issues. It looks to be
centered around autoconf and m4 (surprise ensues). I can cleanly
compile ruby 1.9.3 outside the spec file
Thanks for these rpms. I've been trying to get the 1.9.3 srpm to rebuild
onto EL6 and I've been having some issues. It looks to be centered around
autoconf and m4 (surprise ensues). I can cleanly compile ruby 1.9.3
outside the spec file (without patches, macros etc) but once I attempt to
build
Dne 17.12.2011 19:26, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a):
Hello,
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/14/2011 10:33 PM +9:00:
Hi,
I have uploaded updated version of Ruby 1.9.3 packages into my
testing repository.
They are probably very close to the shape of Ruby I'd like to see in
future Fedoras.
First of all,
Hello:
Bohuslav Kabrda wrote, at 12/19/2011 06:06 PM +9:00:
- Installed gems are now divided into different directories. Gems
installed by regular user goes into his/her home directory,
gems installed by root goes to /usr/local/ directory, while the
gems installed by RPM will go into /usr
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
- what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going
to file a feature?
We are targeting Fedora 17. I have already prepared the draft of
feature proposal [1] and I'd like to submit it to FESCo aproval
before
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/19/2011 09:43 PM +9:00:
- Maybe ri directory should be moved to %_libdir/ri for now?
Are you referring to my TODO [2]?
Exactly.
Since this is really tricky.
I agree that, if I claim that the RI documentation is platform specific, it
should go into
Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
- what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going
to file a feature?
We are targeting Fedora 17. I have already prepared the draft of
feature proposal [1] and I'd
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
- what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going
to file a feature?
We are targeting Fedora 17. I have
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:06:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I was thinking that, similarly to how Python 2.6 and 2.7 were handled,
we could have a compatibility RPM for people who depend on 1.8, such as
myself for my downstream projects.
May be you should provide more details for what
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/20/2011 01:06 AM +9:00:
Dne 19.12.2011 16:51, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
- what fedora version
Dne 19.12.2011 17:18, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:06:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I was thinking that, similarly to how Python 2.6 and 2.7 were handled,
we could have a compatibility RPM for people who depend on 1.8, such as
myself for my downstream projects.
May
- Original Message -
From: Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com
To: Ruby SIG mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:45:19 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
My main
Dne 19.12.2011 16:35, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/19/2011 09:43 PM +9:00:
- Maybe ri directory should be moved to %_libdir/ri for now?
Are you referring to my TODO [2]?
Exactly.
Since this is really tricky.
I agree that, if I claim that the RI
Hello,
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/14/2011 10:33 PM +9:00:
Hi,
I have uploaded updated version of Ruby 1.9.3 packages into my testing
repository.
They are probably very close to the shape of Ruby I'd like to see in future
Fedoras.
First of all, I appreciate your work on ruby 193 packaging.
On 12/14/2011 08:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded updated version of Ruby 1.9.3 packages into my testing
repository. They are probably very close to the shape of Ruby I'd like
to see in future Fedoras. The main changes are:
Hey Vit, a couple questions came up RE: Ruby 1.9.3
15 matches
Mail list logo