Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2012-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 24.12.2011 01:54, Michael Stahnke napsal(a): Thanks for these rpms. I've been trying to get the 1.9.3 srpm to rebuild onto EL6 and I've been having some issues. It looks to be centered around autoconf and m4 (surprise ensues). I can cleanly compile ruby 1.9.3 outside the spec file

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-23 Thread Michael Stahnke
Thanks for these rpms. I've been trying to get the 1.9.3 srpm to rebuild onto EL6 and I've been having some issues. It looks to be centered around autoconf and m4 (surprise ensues). I can cleanly compile ruby 1.9.3 outside the spec file (without patches, macros etc) but once I attempt to build

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17.12.2011 19:26, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a): Hello, Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/14/2011 10:33 PM +9:00: Hi, I have uploaded updated version of Ruby 1.9.3 packages into my testing repository. They are probably very close to the shape of Ruby I'd like to see in future Fedoras. First of all,

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Hello: Bohuslav Kabrda wrote, at 12/19/2011 06:06 PM +9:00: - Installed gems are now divided into different directories. Gems installed by regular user goes into his/her home directory, gems installed by root goes to /usr/local/ directory, while the gems installed by RPM will go into /usr

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: - what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going to file a feature? We are targeting Fedora 17. I have already prepared the draft of feature proposal [1] and I'd like to submit it to FESCo aproval before

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Hello, again: Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/19/2011 09:43 PM +9:00: - Maybe ri directory should be moved to %_libdir/ri for now? Are you referring to my TODO [2]? Exactly. Since this is really tricky. I agree that, if I claim that the RI documentation is platform specific, it should go into

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: - what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going to file a feature? We are targeting Fedora 17. I have already prepared the draft of feature proposal [1] and I'd

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: - what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going to file a feature? We are targeting Fedora 17. I have

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:06:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: I was thinking that, similarly to how Python 2.6 and 2.7 were handled, we could have a compatibility RPM for people who depend on 1.8, such as myself for my downstream projects. May be you should provide more details for what

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/20/2011 01:06 AM +9:00: Dne 19.12.2011 16:51, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: - what fedora version

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 19.12.2011 17:18, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:06:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: I was thinking that, similarly to how Python 2.6 and 2.7 were handled, we could have a compatibility RPM for people who depend on 1.8, such as myself for my downstream projects. May

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - From: Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com To: Ruby SIG mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:45:19 PM Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: My main

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 19.12.2011 16:35, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a): Hello, again: Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/19/2011 09:43 PM +9:00: - Maybe ri directory should be moved to %_libdir/ri for now? Are you referring to my TODO [2]? Exactly. Since this is really tricky. I agree that, if I claim that the RI

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-17 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Hello, Vít Ondruch wrote, at 12/14/2011 10:33 PM +9:00: Hi, I have uploaded updated version of Ruby 1.9.3 packages into my testing repository. They are probably very close to the shape of Ruby I'd like to see in future Fedoras. First of all, I appreciate your work on ruby 193 packaging.

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 testing repository

2011-12-16 Thread Mo Morsi
On 12/14/2011 08:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, I have uploaded updated version of Ruby 1.9.3 packages into my testing repository. They are probably very close to the shape of Ruby I'd like to see in future Fedoras. The main changes are: Hey Vit, a couple questions came up RE: Ruby 1.9.3