On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 19.12.2011 16:26, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): > >On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>>- what fedora version are you targeting this for and are you going > >>>to file a feature? > >>We are targeting Fedora 17. I have already prepared the draft of > >>feature proposal [1] and I'd like to submit it to FESCo aproval > >>before Christmas. > > >How will Ruby 1.8 be handled? Will we keep a ruby-1.8 package around? > > No, sorry, I don't plan it. There is no reason except nostalgia. You > can use JRuby if you really need.
I was thinking that, similarly to how Python 2.6 and 2.7 were handled, we could have a compatibility RPM for people who depend on 1.8, such as myself for my downstream projects. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpXG2N1I7c0z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
