Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 22:41: Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 16:54: Current leftovers (wrt library dependency issue): $ dnf repoquery --repo=koji-ruby30 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires "libruby.so.2.7()(64bit)" | cat -n

Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 16:54: Current leftovers (wrt library dependency issue): $ dnf repoquery --repo=koji-ruby30 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires "libruby.so.2.7()(64bit)" | cat -n = 3   

Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 8:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): 1    kf5-kross-interpreters-20.08.3-1.fc34.src.rpm build fails: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59090361 /builddir/build/BUILD/kross-interpreters-20.08.3/ruby/rubyinterpreter.cpp:69:5: error: 'rb_set_safe_level' was not

Re: Ruby 3.0 change proposal

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 11:20 Jun Aruga napsal(a): Upgrade/compatibility impact Is it better to mention about the `%{gem_plugin}` macro for the file to %files section to the Upgrade/compatibility impact section if it is encouraged to add it to rubygem- packages?

Re: Ruby 3.0 change proposal

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 11:28 Jun Aruga napsal(a): I think we can add not only the upstream github's NEWS.md but also the ruby-lang's release note too, as obviously the Fedora wiki page's content is copied from the upstream page. https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/12/25/ruby-3-0-0-released/ Though

Re: Ruby 3.0 change proposal

I think we can add not only the upstream github's NEWS.md but also the ruby-lang's release note too, as obviously the Fedora wiki page's content is copied from the upstream page. https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/12/25/ruby-3-0-0-released/ Though the ruby-lang page is not mentioned on Ruby

Re: Ruby 3.0 change proposal

> Upgrade/compatibility impact Is it better to mention about the `%{gem_plugin}` macro for the file to %files section to the Upgrade/compatibility impact section if it is encouraged to add it to rubygem- packages? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/76 We might also add the

Re: Ruby 3.0 change proposal

> Ruby 3.0.0.preview1 NEWS Above link text and the actual link (https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v3_0_0_preview1/NEWS.md) for the preview 1 are outdated. -- Jun | He - His - Him ___ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Ruby 3.0 change proposal

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Hi Rubyists, > > The release of Ruby 3.0 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild > after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.0 change proposal [1]. It > is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any >

Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 9:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 07. 01. 21 v 6:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a):    rubygem-snmp - builds ok This one ^^ is noarch and should not have devepnedncy on ruby-devel IMO. Should not need rebuild. I have rather updated the package. Vít

Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 6:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a): - Original Message - From: "Vít Ondruch" To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:23:36 PM Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild The PR was merged and should be available in the side tag. Should anybody

Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 6:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a): rubygem-snmp - builds ok This one ^^ is noarch and should not have devepnedncy on ruby-devel IMO. Should not need rebuild. There might be more like this. rubygem-unicode - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59091846

Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild

Dne 07. 01. 21 v 8:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): = 4    rubygem-debug_inspector-0.0.3-11.fc33.src.rpm build fails: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59090797 current directory: