Mirko Stocker wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 December 2006 22:54, Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
>
>> (http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ParseTree/ ),
>> and moving to the latest JRuby trunk fixed a lot of things I had
>> problems with in the old code.
>>
> Sounds interesting :) Do you have
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 22:54, Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
> Yes, they added specific names instead of indexes for ... something
> (some arguments, can't remember details).
> I'm finishing up a JRuby port of ParseTree
> (http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ParseTree/ ),
> and moving t
Mirko Stocker wrote:
> tests, so migrating should be doable in time. What I fear quite a bit is the
> changes around the ScopeNode, which we use a lot. But we can work with Defn-
> and DefsNodes instead, so that should work too.
Yes, that's the way to go.
> There are also things that
> are easi
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 22:26, Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
> Don't know which JRuby you're using at the moment, but some Tom's fixes
> caused changes in NodeVisitor (a new visitRootNode method was added, but
> the visitScopeNode method was removed). There was also some reshuffling
> in t
Mirko Stocker wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:59, Christopher Williams wrote:
>
>> I vote strongly for migrating the refactoring and other work you've done to
>> RDT
>>
> Ok :) I think I'd prefer that too. If the migration to the latest JRuby isn't
> too complicated, we can p
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:59, Christopher Williams wrote:
> I vote strongly for migrating the refactoring and other work you've done to
> RDT
Ok :) I think I'd prefer that too. If the migration to the latest JRuby isn't
too complicated, we can probably merge in the christmas holidays o
Mirko,
Our thesis is done next week, maybe I can find some time to work on this,
although it might be more useful to migrate the refactorings into RDT
first..
I vote strongly for migrating the refactoring and other work you've done to
RDT
The structural diff view is a nice to have, but c
Hi Chris
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 16:35, Christopher Williams wrote:
> I took your patch and ran with it - it now resembles the JDT's version
> quite a bit (like most everything). The syntax coloring is now done as
> well. I just checked it into the SVN head.
I saw your commit, thanks a l
Mirko, all,
I took your patch and ran with it - it now resembles the JDT's version
quite a bit (like most everything). The syntax coloring is now done as well.
I just checked it into the SVN head. It also brought up a fix for the
HyperlinkDetector stuff from murphee in the RubySourceViewerConfigu
Hi!
I'm trying to implement a merge view for RDT (the view that is shown to watch
diffs, for example to synchronize with the repository or before applying a
refactoring). I thought it shouldn't be too hard to da and would be nice to
have, but I can't get it working. The font of the view changes
10 matches
Mail list logo
