Matt:
If you just want data rolled up for *one* Utility (I'm
guessing that's what `u` in the code above is...)
you could skip the group:
sum = u.utility_data.sum(:ami_residential)
You are spot on: in this case I'm just considering one Utility at a
time. I don't know what possessed me to
Solved (though I'm not entirely sure why this works):
UtilityDatum.
select(sum(ami_residential)).
where(:utility = u).
group(utility_id).
reorder('').
first
The reorder() prevents the ORDER BY clause from being emitted, so the
generated SQL is valid.
--
Posted via
The following works:
r = u.utility_data.select(utility_id,
sum(ami_residential)).group(utility_id)
= #ActiveRecord::Relation [#UtilityDatum id: nil, utility_id:
5621]
r.first[:sum]
= 263
but when written as a one-liner:
u.utility_data.select(utility_id,
BTW, I also tried this:
UtilityDatum.
select(sum(ami_residential)).
where(:utility = u).
group(utility_id).
unscope(:order, :limit).
first
... but that still tacks on ORDER BY and LIMIT clauses to the query, so
it still fails. Evidently I don't understand unscope().
--
Posted via
This is posted years after the fact, but just in case anyone arrives via
a web search:
The rescue_from method shown above will NOT catch routing errors in
Rails 3.1 and Rails 3.2. In particular, this won't work:
# file: app/controllers/application_controller.rb
class
[This is mostly an update on
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11447042/ (thanks Fred!), but I'll
take my answer from wherever I can get it...]
Short form: does the postgresql db adaptor cache queries? I'm passing
lots of large raw SQL queries (160k bytes each), and my private virtual
memory is
Colin Law wrote in post #1065800:
What is the class of found?
I updated the above mentioned gist. 'expected' is a DateTme, 'found' is
ActiveSupport::TimeWithZone.
Also I don't think you have told us which versions of ruby and rails
you are using.
Apologies, this was buried at the end of
I have isolated what appears to be a bug in the Rails extensions to
DateTime, but I don't know where to report it.
I have a standalone file to demonstrate the bug, but the punch line is
that this code:
TestRecord.create!(:f_datetime = (expected = DateTime.jd(200)))
found =
Can you post the contents of schema.rb section for the table.
Also it would be interesting to put in some inspect debug for expected
and found.
Colin:
Done. See https://gist.github.com/2967023 for code and results.
As for inspect debug for expected and found, I assume you mean like
this:
Walter Davis wrote in post #1065560:
What version of rake, what version of Ruby, what version of Rails? Also,
what version of Gem? ...
Walter's right. This is just a hunch, but you might try:
gem update --system
and see if that helps.
- ff
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
I've created:
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/6814
... which seems like the correct place to report this. I'm sure I'll
hear from the rails admin team soon enough if that's not the right
place.
- ff
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because
Stack Overflow and various forums are rife with questions about how to
efficiently update or insert ActiveRecords into a table. (In fact, one
of my earliest questions to this forum was on this very topic.)
My recent work regularly calls for an efficient update or insert
method for tens of
Colin Law wrote in post #1055228:
On 6 April 2012 01:10, Fearless Fool li...@ruby-forum.com wrote:
- the first test fails with response.message = Not Acceptable
- the second test fails because count is not incremented.
First look in test.log to see if there is any difference there, if
still
REDACTED!
Okay, it's 100% my error.
Ability#initialize IS getting called.
The source of my woes: I was explicitly passing :user_id = 1001 to
Premise#initialize, which was overriding the :user_id that CanCan was
providing. It was bad luck (or bad judgement) that I chose 1001 as the
id -- this
I'm doing RSpec controller testing with CanCan authorization, and I'm
seeing something I've never seen in RSpec before: the same test run
twice fails on the second one. I am NOT doing before(:all) or other
things that should cause state to persist between tests:
Here's the relevant code:
UPDATE: I noticed that I had a rails console --sandbox running in
another window. When I quit that, the behavior of the test changed.
Dramatically. I haven't sorted through the new errors, but it's clear
that the --sandbox process was causing the db to respond differently.
--
Posted via
MORE UPDATE: I beefed up the tests to look at the return code, the # of
Premises generated and the assignment. And things only got stranger:
context POST create do
context with user logged in do
before(:each) do
@user = mock_model(User, :admin? = false, :guest? = false)
Joe V. wrote in post #1053641:
A SQL query takes around 1 ms, possibly more if the db server is on a
different machine. That is way more expensive than rescuing an
exception.
Joe: Thanks for the useful data point. Just to make sure my
understanding is complete, since any db transaction is
(This is may be more of a db design question than a rails question.)
Summary:
I'm thinking of creating a single AR class to hold constant symbol
values and use it for :has_many_through relations whenever I need a
constant symbol. Is this a good idea or a bad idea?
Details:
I notice that I
Let me redact that previous post...my only excuse is that I hadn't had
my coffee yet!
If the time to make a DB query (let's call it 1 Unit of time) swamps out
any amount of processing in Ruby, then:
Approach A (do a SELECT to check for existence of the record before
attempting an insert) will
Tim Shaffer wrote in post #1054854:
What problem are you trying to solve by doing this?
Just seems like it would make your code more complicated with no real
benefit.
DRYer code: this approach has fewer distinct tables, fewer distinct
classes, fewer things to test and maintain. But I may be
Peter Vandenabeele wrote in post #1052874:
A custom validation on the compound unique key would behave
similar, always do a SELECT (and suffer from the race condition
documented in
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Validations/ClassMethods.html#method-i-validates_uniqueness_of
The basic question: how do you mock (or stub) a reference to a
polymorphic class in RSpec? Trying the obvious thing leads to an error
of the form:
undefined method `base_class' for Post:Class
=== The details:
# file: app/models/relation.rb
class Relation ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to
I love the query interface (ActiveMethod::QueryMethods), but one thing
has bugged me: why doesn't it generate calls for polymorphic
associations? For example:
class MyModel ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :parent, :polymorphic = true
end
I would expect:
MyModel.where(:parent = a)
to be
I have an ActiveRecord that has several foreign keys, where the foreign
keys act as a single compound key that needs to be unique:
class CreateRelations ActiveRecord::Migration
def change
create_table :relations do |t|
t.references :src, :null = false
t.references :dst, :null =
Francis P. wrote in post #1052528:
I know this is an old topic, and perhaps you've solved it.
@Francis: thank you for that.
For the record, what I've ended up doing is something like the
following. The key thing that took me a while to figure out what to set
the table_name in the base class:
Robb Kidd wrote in post #1050675:
class Fruit ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :basket
end
class Apple Fruit
end
class Basket ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :fruits
end
Ref: Single Table Inheritance
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html
Robb: Pardon -- Although
File this under mild pedantry, but it's been bugging me. Assume I want
to store different kinds of fruit in an STI table. My approach works,
but I end up referring to fruit_bases throughout my code where I'd
really prefer just fruits.
What I've got is something like:
=
# File:
I have a pair of models with a fairly standard :has_many relation. The
only twist is that the has_many table is a namespaced STI table:
module MeteredService
class Base ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :service_bills, :foreign_key = :metered_service_id,
:dependent = :destroy
...
end
end
Sometimes I intentionally introduce small typos to see if you're paying
attention! :) The suggested SQL should have read:
DELETE FROM service_bills WHERE metered_service_id =
my_metered_service.id
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are
I find myself writing the following frequently:
r = MyActiveRecord.where(:attr1 = cond1, :attr2 = cond2, ...)
r.exists? ? r.first : r.create
... which has the effect of returning an instance of MyActiveRecord if
all the conditions are met, or creating one if it doesn't. A variant of
This isn't a question -- it's just me being astonished by yet another
thing in Rails that Just Works. Here it is:
=
class Wizard ActiveRecord::Base
before_create :create_deferrables
has_one :weather_loader, :as = :owner, :dependent = :destroy
def create_deferrables
Alexey Muranov wrote in post #1038755:
I like the idea.
By the way, the issues are not on Lighthouse anymore but on GitHub:
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues
Right you are. So, feeling a little like David facing off against
Goliath, I've submitted a ticket:
Tim Shaffer wrote in post #1038731:
I apologize... I guess I wasn't sure what you were asking.
No problem!
ActionController::Base doesn't have *any* methods included.
You're right -- I mis-spoke:
s/ActionController::Base/standard Rails distribution/g
In addition to the resourceful routes,
I've just finished a toy project that I call righteously ubiquitous
javascript:
https://github.com/rdpoor/righteous_ujs
and the experience has convinced me that Rails controllers need a
#delete method that parallels the contracts of the #new and #edit
methods. To explain: The three verbs
Tim Shaffer wrote in post #1038479:
You can easily add a delete method to your controller:
... which is exactly what I did in the cited code example.
I'm not sure how to interpret your reply. Sure it's trivial to add.
Are you claiming that a delete method should NOT become part of the
I'm cleaning up how I use Delayed::Job in my app. It's processing an
ActiveRecord as a delayed task. If the task ends with an error, I'd
*like* to set myActiveRecord.errors[:base] 'error message'. The only
twist is that errors will be caught in the delayed task's thread.
My early experiments
[Cross posted to Ruby on Rails Forum and Mechanize mailing list.]
I'm using Mechanize for page scraping (Ruby 1.9.2 / Rails 3.0.5 /
Mechanize 2.0.1). I'm seeing a case where a single
agent.get(url)
generates two HTTP GETs. Why is this happening?
The response to the first GET is a 200 (no
UPDATE: sort of solved.
The web server sets Content-Length to a incorrect value (at least for
compressed replies), and Mechanize was re-trying the GET before giving
up.
The temporary fix is to monkey patch Mechanize::HTTP::Agent to ignore
Content-Length.
A longer-term fix would be to include
I'm sure there's an obvious answer: I want to create a slightly
customized version of my RoR app. It involves minor tweaks to some
routes, changes to some of the layouts, turning off devise's
:registerable and other bits scattered around the source code.
I'd like to define a single variable or
I want to convert analytical results (i.e. numbers) into prose (i.e.
English sentences). In addition to generating the words, I also want to
be able to style bits of the text (presumably by decorating them with
css classes).
For example, assume something contrived like:
def
Jeroen van Ingen wrote in post #1031839:
Mechanize looks good, I'll definitely give it a try.
Where I'm basically searching for is a gem or library that can store a
session / cookie, so Rails can login on a website in the background.
Anyone who know if there are other options besides
I have a form containing a text field along the lines of:
%= form_for(wizard, :url = wizard_path, :method = :put) do |f| %
%= form.text_field gas_credentials[user_id], :value =
wizard.gas_credentials['user_id'] %
% end %
Mysteriously, when wizard.gas_credentials is nil, the
Doh! The answer: browser autocompletion. I'm leaving this post in
place rather than deleting it out of shame in the faint hope that it
might save someone else a few minutes of head scratching.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
[silly forum code won't let me edit previous reply.]
To prevent autocompletion, you can do something like:
%= form.text_field gas_credentials[user_id],
:value = wizard.gas_credentials['user_id'],
:autocomplete = :off
%
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
@venkata: Ruby makes a lot of things optional that other languages
require. It makes typing easier, but can lead to the very confusion you
encountered.
The first shorthand to know is that in Ruby, function and method calls
can omit the parentheses that bracket the arguments, so your examples:
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #1017751:
The guts were moved into ActiveModel, but you can use it with active
record just like you used too. There was some fairly major refactoring
in rails 3 which confuses apidock quite a bit.
Word.
I eventually found the more modern docs for
Alpha Blue wrote in post #1019380:
I would decide what customizations you are willing to support or not
support.
Life would be lovely if that were up to me. But the person with the
checkbook gets to make that decision. (Of course, I can charge more for
some customizations...)
For the ones
Good news everyone: a customer wants to license our Rails-based app!
(Maybe we'll be able to afford something fancier than ramen noodle for
dinner!!!) The bad news is that they want a custom logo, custom color
scheme and a few tweaks here and there.
What are the established techniques for
waseem ahmad wrote in post #1017743:
Following might be useful.
http://ar.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Dirty.html
Got that, and I notice that those are all vintage 2008. But I also note
that in:
http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveRecord/Dirty
... that ActiveRecord::Dirty ...is
If my table reads like this:
create_table(:pet_owners, :force = true) do |t|
t.boolean :has_allergies
end
... then ActiveRecord::Base generates the following methods:
:has_allergies
:has_allergies=
:has_allergies?
:has_allergies_before_type_cast
:has_allergies_change
Resurrecting an old thread because it has a useful lesson:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #927576:
Fearless Fool wrote:
[stuff about a before_destroy method using two destroy_all calls]
Great! You can probably unify those into one query and get better
performance at the expense of a bit
I realize that I don't know what causes an ActionController to be
created and destroyed. As a specific example, consider:
class UsersController ApplicationController
def myState
@myState ||= Object.new
end
def show
...
end
end
Is there one ActionController
Max Schubert wrote in post #996908:
Could you respond with your development.rb file (with names sanitized
as needed?) .. what version of Rails are you using? We have been
using 3.0.5, just upgrading to 3.0.7 this week
Sure. Here it is. Thanks.
= versions (I'll move to 3.0.7 when
@ Fred, @Robert Pankowecki:
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #996972:
Have you been mixing in calls to require with calls to
require_dependency/letting rails load things automatically? That can
make a giant mess of things where some classes are reloaded and others
aren't, so for example
@Robert, @Fred, @Max
GOT IT! You all had a piece of the puzzle.
(Robert: As an aside, you mean you call Product.descendants() -- not
dependencies() -- but that's a trifle.)
I realized that my reason that the Fred/Robert solution didn't work was
correct: a request passes in the string
I have an STI class structure:
class MeteredService ActiveRecord::Base ; end
class PGEService MeteredService ; end
class SCEService MeteredService ; end
In my view, I want update (say) the :resource field:
%= form_for(metered_service, :url =
metered_service_path(metered_service)) do |f| %
Max Schubert wrote in post #996758:
Fearless,
Well, not really a bug - it is 'behavior as designed' but it is also a
'fail' for those of us using 'meta-programming as designed LOL'
because meta-programming requires that classes be loaded and that the
callbacks associated with Object and Class
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #996771:
descendants returns all loaded subclasses, but when class caching is
off, classes are cleared out, so the freshly loaded copy of MyModel has
no loaded subclasses.
Robert Pankowecki wrote in post #996778:
Use require_dependency to load subclasses.
@
[@Max: our messages just crossed. With all due respect, I think I like
my approach better!]
Okay. I'm out of the weeds, but I'd like to know if I've done it the
right way.
My code references subclasses of MeteredService several transactions
after metered_service.rb gets loaded (e.g. the result
Fearless Fool wrote in post #996867:
[@Max: our messages just crossed. With all due respect, I think I like
my approach better!]
snip
So now I overload MeteredService.descendants, calling 'require' instead
of 'require_dependency'. This seems to work just fine:
snip
Let me know if I'm
Fearless Fool wrote in post #996869:
So my next approach will be some magick with const_defined? -- this time
for sure!!! ;)
I tried that and now I'm really confused. @Fred: would you expect it to
be the case that:
class MeteredService ActiveRecord::Base ; end
class PGEBusiness
Resistance is futile.
Until someone chimes in with a better idea, I'm adopting Max's approach
(above).
- ff
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
@Max:
Fearless Fool wrote in post #996874:
Until someone chimes in with a better idea, I'm adopting Max's approach
(above).
I thought you might want to know: I've implemented your approach and I'm
STILL seeing the problem: the descendants are defined the first time,
but gone thereafter. I
[I posted this initially to the StackOverflow list. There have been no
nibbles, so I'm coming here to consult the real experts! :)]
I want to display a selection list of MyModel subclasses in a view. It's
not working yet, so for sanity checking, I included this in my view:
%=
@Max:
Max Schubert wrote in post #996743:
I am guessing you are in development mode with class caching off :)
and that this behavior does not occur in test nor production mode ...
Try the code with either test or production if you haven't already ...
Thanks for the tip. Rather than try to
[I originally posted this on the jquery forum, but I realize that I'll
have to figure out the right syntax for form_for anyway, so it makes
sense to cross-post here...]
I'd like to be able to render forms, augmented by unobtrusive javascript
that behave as follows:
When javascript is enabled,
I have an STI model where UtilityProvider is the parent class, and
there's a sub-class for each specific utility provider.
When the user goes to choose a UtilityProvider, I want to present a
pull-down list of UtilityProvider.subclasses (or, more likely, a
filtered version of that), and when the
Bryan Crossland wrote in post #993205:
What is the code for the method find_stations_near?
First, here's the code for find_local_weather_stations(). The create
method raises the error:
def find_local_weather_stations(limit = 10)
premise_weather_stations.delete_all
stations =
Okay, I have found a fix, or at least a workaround. If a Rails core
team member is reading this, I'd appreciate knowing if this warrants a
lighthouse ticket.
If I add a .reload (to the AR that is already in the db):
def load_station(candidate)
if (incumbent =
UPDATE: Stranger and stranger. I do NOT get this error running in the
console. I do NOT get this error running the test suite. I ONLY get
this error under 'rails server'. I tracked the Rails source to where
the AssociationTypeMismatch is raised in association_proxy.rb:
def
Hi Bryan:
Bryan Crossland wrote in post #993150:
PremiseWeatherStation.create(:premise = self, :weather_station =
station)
I've been unable to reproduce your error in the rails server or in the
console. However, what I do see is that self is a reserved word. The
variable name of the object
I'm spidering historical weather data from various sources. I have a
WeatherStation class that is begging for an STI implementation: a
WeatherStation is associated with a specific weather service, and each
weather service has its own protocol for fetching weather data, but most
of the code is can
Perhaps this is just
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/1505406
coming back to bite me -- I suspect I'm missing a trivial declaration.
Error message (note that NOAA is an STI subclass of WeatherStation)
ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch (WeatherStation(#2169635200)
expected, got
I'm not sure what Rails elements come into play here, so I'm just
calling this the store locator problem. Bear with me...
Assume I have a database-backed Store model. And that it has a
locator method that returns a list of NEW store objects -- NOT YET
SAVED IN THE DB -- that are near a given
Update: After mulling this over for a few hours, I have concluded that
I'm asking two distinct questions:
Q1: If I have a page that contains a partial that contains a form that
invokes an action in MyController, how do I return the results to the
original page?
A1a: I could (somehow) arrange
@Msan: I had never heard of compass before your question. So I did a
google of rails compass, and the first article it came up with was
Using Compass with Blueprint in Rails:
http://billsaysthis.com/content/compass-blueprint-rails.php
Perhaps you'll find it useful while you are waiting for a
I just pushed my second ever project to github (go gentle on me!):
https://github.com/rdpoor/roogle_graphics/
roogle_graphics is a standalone Ruby module that generates simple
graphics using Google Chart API service. You place text and polygons
in a roogle_graphics plot, it emits a really
A question for the pros: I want to dig into the Rails source code to
understand How Things Work. What tools do people use for interactive
browsing?
In particular, I'd like to be able to point at a method name (or
package, or class) in the source code, see a list places where that's
defined, and
nellinux wrote in post #985959:
What is the best mode for Rails in Emacs ?
I have emacs-rails but it seems not updated to support rails 3.
Heh - I didn't know there was an emacs-rails mode until your query --
thank you for that. Poking around, I found:
In our app, users give us sensitive information (credentials for
logging into a third party site). At some point, we need those
credentials in cleartext in order to access the third party site, but
while they're in our database, we want to make best effort for
protecting them.
What techniques
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #984876:
There's a railscast covering one possible approach:
http://railscasts.com/episodes/197-nested-model-form-part-2
@Lorenzo: Looks good. Thanks.
@Frederick: I'm beginning to believe that if you can imagine it, Ryan
Bates has already coded it. Thanks for
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #984616:
That sounds like you've got an unsaved metered_service somewhere (eg
by doing premise.metered_services.build)
Fred
Yep, that's true. I based my code on the canonical blog posts /
comments example, so in views/premises/edit.html.erb, I wrote:
%=
I have two models with a straightforward has_many / belongs_to
relationship:
class Premise ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :metered_services, :dependent = :destroy
...
end
class MeteredService ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :premise
...
end
and nested routes to match:
I'm trying to wrap my head around this, and looking for suggestions:
In ordinary operation, our system calls upon several external web
services to gather info -- these steps can take a while and we want to
give our users feedback on what's happening.
My hunch is that a state-driven model, using
Hi Norbert:
An idiom that I use frequently is:
h = {}
(h[key] ||= []) item
which essentially says if hash h[key] is nil, create an empty array for
that key. then push item onto the array. for example:
h = {}
= {}
(h[cats] ||= []) Jellicle
= [Jellicle]
(h[cats] ||= []) Mr. Mistoffelees
Where it stands:
Infinity can be represented in IEEE floating point numbers.
Infinity can be represented in Ruby, as evidenced by
(1.0/0.0).infinite?
= 1
Infinity can be represented in sqlite (and probably other databases):
sqlite select * from test_recs;
1|Inf|
Yet it appears that
Hi:
The gist of my question: is there a way to *portably* store and retrieve
Infinity in an ActiveRecord float column?
Following is an amusing saga, but it doesn't really answer the question.
Step 1: As was mentioned in http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/74141, you
can't simply write a Ruby
Ralph Shnelvar wrote in post #980334:
How can I do this? That is, I want to find the nearest h1 ... /h1
surrounding Placeholder2.
First, I'll +1 Fred on using Nokogiri for parsing HTML.
But you can modify you regex so any markup '' characters are excluded
using [^], as in:
p =
Do you have a preferred programming pattern for adding functionality to
an ActiveRecord? As an example, say I have some gnarly trig functions
for distance and bearing between pairs of latitude and longitude:
=== file: latlng.rb
module LatLng
def haversine_distance(lat1, lng1, lat2, lng2)
...
Ralph Shnelvar wrote in post #980369:
Fearless, your solution seems to work ... but I am clueless as to how
and why it works!
I'm FAR from a regex wizard, but it's worth noting:
[abc] means match any occurrence of a or b or c
[^abc] means match any character that is NOT a or b or c
ergo
So first, thanks in no small part to Marnen's rants, I've become a
complete RSpec / FactoryGirl / TDD convert. Hey, autotest coupled with
Growl is the bee knees! And I've even started pushing builds out to
Heroku to keep me honest.
Now I feel uneasy when I've written a piece of code that isn't
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #978394:
- any XML data I fetch from the external site is cached
The external site isn't already setting its HTTP caching headers
properly for this?
That's a good suggestion, and I'll certainly look into heeding the HTTP
expiration time stamps. In my case,
A minor correction:
Fearless Fool wrote in post #978457:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #978394:
The external site isn't already setting its HTTP caching headers
properly for this?
That's a good suggestion, and I'll certainly look into heeding the HTTP
expiration time stamps...
I
I've written a simple module to extend ActiveRecord::Base, which works
fine in the rails console but fails miserably in rspec tests. The
intended usage looks like this:
class Premise ActiveRecord::Base
has_my_extensions
end
I've traced it down to the fact that in the console, it loads
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #978281:
Stuff like this belongs in an initializer.
I'm just now realizing how environment.rb has changed in Rails3. Next
question: where does one learn the zen of initializers? Do I create my
own, e.g. $ROOT/config/initializers/my_extensions.rb? And is it
Fearless Fool wrote in post #978285:
... Do I create my
own, e.g. $ROOT/config/initializers/my_extensions.rb?
FWIW, I simply created a $ROOT/config/initializers/my_extensions.rb file
and populated it with:
require 'my_extensions'
... and rspec is all happy. Let me know if that's
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #977813:
Have you got the rails js loaded that detects those attributes and
actually does something with them?
@Fred: As I alluded to in the OP, I'm suspicious that I may have messed
up the default Rails JS when I included JQuery. My
Chris Mear wrote in post #977826:
The default rails.js that ships with Rails 3 is designed to work with
Prototype; you should replace it with one written to work on jQuery, if
you haven't already:
https://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs
Chris
Give that man a cigar!
Evidently I'd installed the
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #977875:
I rarely use delete links...
That's interesting!
My instinct is to suggest defining a GET destroy action. OTOH, that's
not idempotent. Aaugh!
Browsers only generate GETs and POSTs, so any DELETE action needs to be
simulated somehow. And as you
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
