Re: [rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

After my change ide-commons will depend on verifier. Toni On Feb 7, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > factconstraints (at least the GUI/GWT part) should be moved into > ide-common I believe. > If verifier no longer depends on ide-common, that should be possible to > move. > > verfie

Re: [rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

factconstraints (at least the GUI/GWT part) should be moved into ide-common I believe. If verifier no longer depends on ide-common, that should be possible to move. verfier does have any GUI/GWT code (or build therefor). Op 07-02-11 13:38, Esteban Aliverti schreef: > > And what about factconstr

Re: [rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

And what about factconstraint? It should be possible to move it to drools-verifier? Best regards, El feb 7, 2011 5:53 a.m., "Toni Rikkola" escribió: It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. Doing some changes to support this right now. Toni On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 A

Re: [rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. Doing some changes to support this right now. Toni On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > After the split-up drools-verifier is suppose to go into the drools repo > and ide-common is suppose to go into the guvnor

Re: [rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

After the split-up drools-verifier is suppose to go into the drools repo and ide-common is suppose to go into the guvnor repo. So drools-verifier can not depend on ide-common. Is that an option, Toni? With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet Op 04-02-11 23:20, Esteban Aliverti schreef: > @Geoffrey I

[rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints

@Geoffrey I started working on this issue. Here is the associated jira issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1186 The problem is that drools-factconstraints depended on drools-verifier and drools-verifier depends on drools-ide-common. So, if I mo