Re: [rules-users] Iterative diagnosis - how to determine what is the next best fact?

As an answer to your big question: no. There is no distinction between a rule that isn't activated because one of its patterns doesn't match with any of the existing facts or due to the absence of facts of a type. Hence, (A, B and not C) with A, B and C that does not match is indistinguishable

[rules-users] Fw: Guvnor Sample Rule

Hi For this I saved the schema (change-set-1.0.0.xsd) on my local machine and gave the path in the ChangeSet.xml Now its working fine... Regards, Sumeet Karawal Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com - Forwarded by Sumeet Karawal/MUM/TCS on 08/22/2011 03:44 PM -

Re: [rules-users] Iterative diagnosis - how to determine what is the next best fact?

Thank you for the reply Wolfgang! Altho this particular application involves a Expert System, I quite enjoyed learning about drools and I intend to keep studying it in the following months regardless if I end up using it or not right now. A solution (far from ideal) that I came up with was to

Re: [rules-users] Using JBPM 5 with Container Managed Persistence

Hi Hough, Unfortunately, there isn't any documentation on this (Container Managed Persistence w/ jBPM 5) that I know of. I've asked around a little and couldn't find any. What are you using transactions for in your case? jBPM itself has some mechanisms that manage transactions. Regards,

Re: [rules-users] To accumulate or not to accumulate

Hi Wolfgang, I finally decided to test different implementations: * first based on an accumulation function * second (your suggestion) relying on drools to 1) build all SentenceWindows then to 2) locate ManualAnnotations inside those Windows * third (your suggestion as well)

[rules-users] Ant Task to pre-compile xls spreadsheet

hi all I am looking for a sample ant script which shows how an excel spreadsheet can be precompiled and also the dependencies on the class path that are required for it, can anyone poit me in the right direction? Thanks, -- View this message in context:

[rules-users] Are if/then rules possible?

In Drools 5 is it possible for a rule to call one of two specific rules depending on whether the condition in the first rule evaluates to true or false?  For example lets say that there are three rules: A, B, and C.  A is evaluated and if its condition is True then execute rule B, otherwise

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 5.2 method call in rhs

Yes, Im using Guvnor 5.2 -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-2-method-call-in-rhs-tp3275866p3276170.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 5.2 method call in rhs

This version: guvnor-5.2.0.Final-tomcat-6.0.war -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-2-method-call-in-rhs-tp3275866p3276180.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users

Re: [rules-users] DroolsCompilerAntTask task to build jBPM5 package

that class is in drools-compiler-5.2.0.Final.jar I set up my path using pathelement instead of fileset, and compile worked with these jars (droolsPath is of course set for my own environment): path id=drools.classpath pathelement

Re: [rules-users] Ant Task to pre-compile xls spreadsheet

There is a good example in the Drools JBoss Rules 5.0 Developer's Guide chapter 11. I just got this working for my own build, here is my xml, which is part of a larger build script but at least will give you a sample: property name=droolsPath value=../../../shared / path id=drools.classpath

Re: [rules-users] DroolsCompilerAntTask task to build jBPM5 package

I changed my script to use this: fileset dir=${droolsPath} includes=*.jar / instead of the separate pathelement entries and it worked fine. my droolsPath includes all of the jars I listed in my last post (plus many others) -- View this message in context:

Re: [rules-users] Are if/then rules possible?

I was working on a similar scenario. My solution is when rule A fired, insert a fact AF. Rule B's LHS detects if there's an instance of AF and it's only fired if so. And I don't think you can do else in a rule now. So you may consider split rule A into two rules to fire either B or C. Regards Yu

[rules-users] Websphere 7.0 and Drools Guvnor 5.2 Integration

I've Guvnor working with Websphere 7.0 pretty well. That said, I've having problem using JAAS with WebsPhere WSLogin login implementation module, i.e. com.ibm.ws.security.common.auth.module.WSLoginModuleImpl. It seems that Guvnor will accept the any user authentication if you specify a blank

Re: [rules-users] Websphere 7.0 and Drools Guvnor 5.2 Integration

Hi Henry, I vaguely remember seeing the same problem in WAS6. WebSphere documentation says: A username and password must be specified in the callback handler. Custom classes that are added to the Subject on the client side should get propagated to the server automatically whenever security