why is der no .rf file in my HELLO WORLD project..
Where can i read about how to configure a .bpmn flow rule ???
Please can some1 lemme know...is there any difference using a RULEFLOW FILE
(.rf) and a FLOW FILE (.bpmn)
Thanks,
Abhinay
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nab
I have 2 boxes, lets say each size of 5x5 and I have 3 items two size 4x4 and
one item size is 3x3. planner initially planner assigning as follows...
I - When I use 3 items 2 boxes(this produce wrong planning)
item1 (4x4) --> box1 (5x5)
item2 (4x4) --> box2 (5x5)
item3 (4x4) --> box1 (5x5)
>From the Expert manual (emphasis by me)l:
"*All Rule Tables begin with a cell containing "RuleTable"*, optionally
followed by a string within the same cell. The string is used as the
initial part of the name for all rules derived from this Rule Table, with
the row number appended for distinction.
Yep, but this is because the sample is quite old now.
If one day they decide to get rid with .rf files, it's better to start using
jbpm format.
Oh yeah, sample should be upgraded too ...
- Mail original -
De: "paco"
À: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Mardi 26 Juin 2012 17:24:06
It is better if I type them here
NAME
Rulename
"DT Fare Itinerary Compute Discount 1"
"DT Fare Itinerary Compute Discount 2"
"DT Fare Itinerary Compute Discount 3"
"DT Fare Itinerary Compute Discount 4"
DT-Fare-Itinerary-Compute-Discount5
I tried with and without quotes. The suffixed RuleTable
Can't see the entries below "NAME", which doesn't help. Can't you post a
suitably chastened spreadsheet?
-W
On 26 June 2012 17:53, drdaveg wrote:
> I am running decision tables implemented in Excel and the values in the
> NAME
> column are being ignored in favor of the RuleTable (appended with
I am running decision tables implemented in Excel and the values in the NAME
column are being ignored in favor of the RuleTable (appended with an int).
Am I missing something trivial or is this a bug in DROOLS 5.4? I have
attached the screen capture (it is small) but scrunch the non-relevant part
I am using Drools 5.4.0, when I create a simple HelloWorld project
the file. rf is also created, from here I can know how I can create files.
rf.
This can help you to solve your problem.
Paco
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleFlow-not-Found-tp4018251p4018271
up to drools 5.1 (more or less), the new default is jbpm flows, for rules or
not.
JBPM let you do what you can do with former .rf files.
To be shorter : It is the same, at least seen from a ruleflow usage.
Before you ask : you need to add jbpm jars to your drools runtime in order to
make the
yeah !!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleFlow-not-Found-tp4018251p4018269.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://li
What editor do you use? Eclipse?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleFlow-not-Found-tp4018251p4018268.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users
ok don't worry... you was really helpful ... i know what to do ;) ... i'll
let you know. Thanks again.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Write-Assumptions-for-NESTED-List-Object-tp4018241p4018267.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble
On 26/06/2012, aliosha79 wrote:
> thanks for help... but it's not a nonsense... it has a great importance for
> me, as i have a lot of constraints to respect...
You'll have to obey the DRL syntax rules, and you are bound to follow
the givens of your data model. In both respects, your posts exhibi
hi paco,
bt this will create a new Drools Project..
I want to create a RULEFLOW for my drool project..which is already der !!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleFlow-not-Found-tp4018251p4018265.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nab
thanks for help... but it's not a nonsense... it has a great importance for
me, as i have a lot of constraints to respect... the work consists of a
collage of section of code for building a correct rule. So it's really
different for me to use a form or a word instead of another.
Thanks again.
--
V
On 26/06/2012, aliosha79 wrote:
> What if $measureList: measure from $orderLineList ---> becomes --->
> $measureList: MEASURES from $orderLineList ??
>
> is it incorrect syntax?
Yes.
Stop the nonsense, please.
-W
___
rules-users mailing list
rule
Wolfgang,
Yes, I agree. We've been careful with that we expose on the
knowledge-api, but this is clearly an interface that should be there.
Will take care of it.
Edson
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> @Edson: There is, of course, the fundamental problem of t
Sorry Laune... you wrote:
>$measureList: measure from $orderLineList
This is incorrect DRL syntax. You have to extract (using "from") the
elements of orderLine which are of class OrderLineType, and from these
you can extract measure.
What if $measureList: measure from $orderLineLi
oh... ok i'll try this and i let you know.
Really thanks for your help.
Regards.
Alessio
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Write-Assumptions-for-NESTED-List-Object-tp4018241p4018260.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi abhinay_agarwal !
Try this: FILE -> NEW -> OTHERS -> DROOLS ->Drools Project -> Name of
project...
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/RuleFlow-not-Found-tp4018251p4018258.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
On 26/06/2012, aliosha79 wrote:
> Laune,
> i need to know if this form is correct:
>
> when
>$order: OrderType( $orderLineList: this.orderLine, priority != high )
(You could omit "this.")
>$measureList: measure from $orderLineList
This is incorrect DRL syntax. You have to extract (using
Laune,
i need to know if this form is correct:
when
$order: OrderType( $orderLineList: this.orderLine, priority != high )
$measureList: measure from $orderLineList
not ( this.measure < 12 ) from $measureList
then
modify( $order ){ setPriority( "high" ) }
end
The reason is that i
Kindly take my rule as it was written, except for the necessary
adjustments for the names of the getter methods.
-W
On 26/06/2012, aliosha79 wrote:
> if i have well understood the DRL code the solution, in a form more
> compliant
> with my needs, could be something like this:
>
>
> when
>$or
if i have well understood the DRL code the solution, in a form more compliant
with my needs, could be something like this:
when
$order: OrderType( $orderLineList: this.orderLine, priority != high )
$measureList: measure from $orderLineList
not ( this.measure < 12 ) from $measureList
t
Hi Alberto,
I'm not upset, kind the opposite. I'm sorry if my comments sounds harsh. I
was making some assumptions based on my previous experience.
My main point was, let's try to be concrete and let's work on code and
failing tests. I know that is not trivial, but if we want to make the
project be
On 26/06/2012, aliosha79 wrote:
> Sorry, Laune, you've right, i bag your pardon as my first post was not so
> clear. Now i have re-edited it... maybe now the question is clearer. Can
> you
> read it again?
> I don't need to use .size() indeed... my real problem is to access the
> nested list prop
hey i want to make a ruleflow using eclipse..
when i go to FILE -> NEW -> OTHERS -> DROOLS -> here i sud get a RULEFLOW
FILE option which creates a .rf file..
instead of this m getting a FLOW FILE option which is creating a .bpmn
file..
can any1 tellme what is wrong with my eclipse/drools ?
--
Hi
I THINK this interpretations can use :
1) Using a BP ontology as a meta-model of BPs, so that BPMN processes would
be recognized as instances of the concepts defined in that ontology. You can
then "reason" over the precesses themselves.
2012/6/22 Davide Sottara
> Hi Olfa,
> sorry, I've bee
Sorry, Laune, you've right, i bag your pardon as my first post was not so
clear. Now i have re-edited it... maybe now the question is clearer. Can you
read it again?
I don't need to use .size() indeed... my real problem is to access the
nested list properties.. In this case i can access the Quant
@Edson: There is, of course, the fundamental problem of the
pseudo-clock feature being full-bodiedly announced in Drools Fusion
but
SessionPseudoClock remaining absent from the stable API. While the
Fusion manual emphasizes (correctly) that a pseudo-clock is useful in
unit test it's important to no
The Java code as shown has a somewhat unlikely flavour, with
OrderLineMeasure containing the field List. And the
names used in the rules don't match the Java code, e.g.,
getUBLRuleEnginePriority().
And why should a String field quantity indicate the size of a List?
But see below for a (better) wa
Mauricio, seems to me that you're upset. I'm really sorry, I didn't mean
it. I didn't mean this thread to become a fud or some kind of rant.
Comments inline:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
> What I've noticed in the past, doing consulting is that people wants to
> migr
Hi Toni,
It's very interesting to know it. It is possible that it is a bug. I did the
test several times but the results are the same.
Best regard
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Help-please-tp4018136p4018245.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/News-functionalies-on-Drools-verifier-tp4018172p4018244.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.j
34 matches
Mail list logo
