Hi,
Tested this and looks like you found a bug. Made a ticket for it so we
can get it fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121985
Thanks for reporting
Toni Rikkola
On ma, 2014-07-21 at 10:28 -0700, pacovalsera wrote:
Hi all, I'm defining a test scenario within guvnor (now
Hi Toni, thanks for your quick response. As a workaround I'm defining a
getter/setter for the enum member based on a string arg. That is,
/
public String getEnumMemberStr() {return enumMember.name();}
public void setEnumMemberStr(String enumMemberStr)
Hello,
I'm in the process of refactoring the different packages in my project.
How can I move an asset (a guided decision table in this case) from its
current package to a new package ?
It seems there's no button or action for that in drools-wb ?
Regards.
--jps
--
View this message in
A while back there was a discussion on the volume of posts and the range of
post discussions. OptaPlanner already has it’s own google group, which has
helped reduce the volume. There is still the discussion on whether to split
Drools.
My initial idea is to leave this list for installation,
Hi,
I’m trying to wrap my head around how to use a combination of accumulate
from and collect from to get a count of how many unique items there are of a
nested child property and run the RHS of a rule if it’s 1
So I have
Many of Object A
Each one contains
An object B
An object C
Object C
I'm bumping this question for general interest on other possible solutions,
and to give my two cents.
The closest I was to getting this feature in Drools 6 from the public APIs,
is to use a persistent session. Then, when I loaded an existing session, I
would pass a newly created KieBase, like
I wonder if something like this might do it?
when
$set : HashSet ( ) from accumulate ( ObjectA ( $myId : objectC.myId ),
init ( HashSet uniqueIds = new
HashSetString(); ),
action ( uniqueIds.add($id); ),
err, typo there, add() and remove() should be using $myId instead of $id
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jeremy Ary jeremy@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if something like this might do it?
when
$set : HashSet ( ) from accumulate ( ObjectA ( $myId : objectC.myId ),
My last comparison there may be problematic as well...too focused on the
accumulate to see the obvious. I think that approach might still require an
eval to check the size constraint on the list and we don't really want
that.
What you could do instead, however, is insert the hashset into the
Mark, thank you for the response. I was able to reproduce this issue with
6.1CR1 and the latest code from the 6.1.x as of this morning.
I created a bug ticket for this issue and a pull request containing the unit
test I wrote.
Ticket: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-560
Pull request:
I was experimenting with ways of avoiding having to put literal strings
into my rules (it is very fragile and bugs can be silent for a long
time). I tried declaring a global and then tried supplying it to a
query. This generates a backtrace during the newKieSession. A simple
example to provoke
You can add rules programmatically to an existing KieBase, but you have to:
1) add/replace the resource in the KieFileSystem
2) Cast the KieBuilder to InternalKieBuilder and use the
incrementalBuild() method
3) Enjoy and report problems as this is a newer feature
See the test suite here
On 22/07/2014 14:27, Mark Proctor wrote:
A while back there was a discussion on the volume of posts and the range of
post discussions. OptaPlanner already has it’s own google group, which has
helped reduce the volume. There is still the discussion on whether to split
Drools.
My initial
The case may not be supported, but even then, it should be reported as
a compilation error, not as a NPE
I'll investigate and report back later
Thanks
Davide
On 07/22/2014 05:48 PM, Borris wrote:
I was experimenting with ways of avoiding having to put literal strings
into my rules (it is very
Hi Mike,
I merged your test case and fixed the bug with this commit
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/283ba1d94
Thanks a lot for having reported this problem,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
Hi Davide,
I've got a null pointer exception with defeasible. My test case is:
package com.sample
declare Fact
fact: String @key
end
rule init
when
then
System.out.println(inserting initial facts);
insert( new Fact( one ) );
insert( new Fact( two ) );
I’m currently setting a google group, won’t touch nabble. It allows welcome
messages, sticky nodes, and if necessary moderation.
Mark
On 22 Jul 2014, at 18:24, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
As long as Nabble is kept out.
Stackoverflow is, at present, quite reasonable, with a
Stack trace shows the error:
org.drools.core.beliefsystem.defeasible.DefeasibleBeliefSet.removeUndefeated(DefeasibleBeliefSet.java:295)
https://github.com/sotty/drools/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/core/beliefsystem/defeasible/DefeasibleBeliefSet.java
Maybe have a go fixing it
Ack'd and queued.
On 07/22/2014 11:46 PM, Kent Anderson wrote:
It appears there is another condition where Drools holds onto memory
indefinitely. (See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-516)
Use case: We have a set of rules designed to detect a heartbeat, then
report when/if the
I'm using Drools 5.3.0
I'd like to find out if the following scenario is possible:
- Include the repository_export.zip file inside my application WAR file.
This way, Guvnor won't be necessary.
- Provide a special upload page just like Guvnor's Import/Export to upload a
completely new
20 matches
Mail list logo
