With 4.0.0 i am getting the run time exception on functions. what could be
the problem
*Exception*
**
*
java.lang.NullPointerException
*
at org.drools.base.ClassTypeResolver.resolveType(*ClassTypeResolver.java:127
*)
at org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.java.JavaFunctionBuilder.build(*
JavaFuncti
> Just info, I ran a test on about a million requests (loop) and 50 threads.
> approx 6 business Obectts and 15 rules. I did get any concurrent modfication
> issues on JBoss Rules 4. Can you please post the rule scripts/DRL used
>
> regards,
> Arjun
>
Sorry Typo. I was saying is I "did not" g
Anthony,
If you have a choice on your binding framework, I might suggesting
switching to Castor. I had the same problem you experienced and
switched to Castor and it worked like a champ.
Ron
On 7/23/07, trandinh tho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I got same problem to Chris's. Java classe
Hello,
I got same problem to Chris's. Java classes are generated from XML schema
(using XMLBean). And the problem occurs when I try to assert objects of those
classes into working memory. The exception is:
java.lang.VerifyError: class b2BContext.impl.UserImplShadowProxy overrides
final method
I am working on a drools application with few rules and large number
of facts. In my first design I tried to avoid excessive joins thinking
I was helping improve performance but didnt realized that I was
actually shooting myself in the foot. I was basically creating a
single facade-fact that would
I'm in the process of upgrading from 2.1 to 3.0 and I've noticed the
signature for knowledgeHelper.modifyObject( Object object ) has changed to
include a FactHandle for it.
Architecturally, does this imply that a list of all fact handles for all
asserted objects has to be maintained in order for
dpark exchangesolutions.com> writes:
>
>
> I'm in the process of upgrading our decision table rules from 2.1 to 3.0.
> However I've run into a bit of a snag that I hope someone can help me with.
>
> We have a generalized consolidation rule that:
> * takes 2 parameters of the same Object Type
I'm in the process of upgrading our decision table rules from 2.1 to 3.0.
However I've run into a bit of a snag that I hope someone can help me with.
We have a generalized consolidation rule that:
* takes 2 parameters of the same Object Type
* makes sure that they don't point to the same referen
> I need to do two things:
> 1. Support sequencing of rule groups
> 2. allow two modes: a. Execute all rules, b. Break on first rule
..ok, let me go one level further, ...even if the decision table does not
support it; I want to dynamically invoke it. This is what I really want.
I.e. If the swi
Edson Tirelli post.com> writes:
>
>
> Can you please provide details or better yet a self contained example that
shows the problem. []s Edson
> 2007/7/23, McShiv <
> rajesh_sachin10 yahoo.co.in>:
> Hi, I am getting the following error when I try to run the rules in
> bulk(EG: 5 or
Hi,
I reported this earlier also, I cant understand why do we not provide AGENDA-
Group support for Decision tables, while we do provide Activation?
See DefaultRuleSheetListener.
I need to do two things:
1. Support sequencing of rule groups
2. allow two modes: a. Execute all rules, b. Break on f
Can you please provide details or better yet a self contained example
that shows the problem.
[]s
Edson
2007/7/23, McShiv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I am getting the following error when I try to run the rules in
bulk(EG: 5 or 6 rules together). But when I start running the rules
in
Hello!
Could somebody please point me where is it possible to find Drools 4.0
repository for Maven2?
http://repository.jboss.com/maven2/org/drools/ contains versio 3.0.5 latest.
Thanks in advance!
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
___
rules-users mailing list
Hi,
I am getting the following error when I try to run the rules in
bulk(EG: 5 or 6 rules together). But when I start running the rules
individually, all the rules are working fine.
0060 SystemErr R org.drools.spi.ConsequenceException:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
Hi spilirit,
Try copy all your dependencies to the WebContent/WEB-INF/lib instead
referring in your project. The Eclipse IDE will automatically add
these libs to your classpath and to your exported war.
Regards
Fernando Meyer http://fmeyer.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: 0xD804DDFB
Hi Burr,
That would be very kind from you, if you could send me the WAR,
Thank you,
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Michael Neale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hi Arjun - I wouldn't recommend re-using session unless there is some
expensive state you wish to reuse. Pooling them will use up far more resources
then freeing them. You should only pool expensive to obtain resources.
Hi Michael,
thanks a lot for yo
When I use my rule flow with only one asserted fact it work very well, but
when I assert more than one fact it goes wrong. I used the Audit View to fix
the problem.
My rule flow : Start -> ruleFlowGroup1 -> split -> ruleFlowGroup2
Hi,
please fond attached a copy of my Eclipse project,
Burr; that would be very kind from you, if you could send me the WAR,
Thankyou for your Help
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rule
19 matches
Mail list logo
