On 06/10/2011 00:09, Davide Sottara wrote:
> As far as I know, the parser does not check the number of rules in a DRL
> Maybe you could do something like this:
>
> (i) use a KnowledgeBuilder to load the DRL resource;
> (ii) before you add the packages to the knowledgeBase, iterate over
> kBuilder.g
As far as I know, the parser does not check the number of rules in a DRL
Maybe you could do something like this:
(i) use a KnowledgeBuilder to load the DRL resource;
(ii) before you add the packages to the knowledgeBase, iterate over
kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() to find the package generated fr
Hi Slyfox,
nice to read you.
Am 05.10.2011 23:49, schrieb slyfox:
> is this something I missed in the doc
As you are talking about "the doc", it seems you have a particular part
of the solution already in mind (the product/tool you'd like to use to
enforce the size limit). Up to now, you did not
is this something I missed in the doc or would you mind pointing me in the
direction of how to accomplish this?
thanks
Bobby
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-rule-limit-tp3394660p3398077.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at N
I've attached a simple stand-alone example to the ticket.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-3-0-CR1-has-broken-existing-rules-flows-tp3390922p3398007.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
I created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3234 JBRULES-3234 . I
haven't yet been able to create a stand-alone example, but I'll keep trying.
I did attach the three rules in question to the ticket.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-3-0-CR1-has-broken-e
Thanks, Mark. That's what I figured. Not sure why it worked for Alejandro,
but I won't pursue that avenue anymore. As I mentioned earlier, I did try
to upgrade to 5.3.0.CR1, but there's a new bug in that version that makes it
unusable for me. (You've been involved in that thread as well). I'm
On 05/10/2011 19:11, Jamie wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Alejandro.
>
> I'm currently using these jars:
>
> knowledge-api-5.2.0.Final.jar
> drools-core-5.2.0.Final.jar
> drools-compiler-5.2.0.Final.jar
> jbpm-flow-5.1.0.Final.jar
> jbpm-flow-builder-5.1.0.Final.jar
> jbpm-bpmn2-5.1.0.F
Thanks for the reply, Alejandro.
I'm currently using these jars:
knowledge-api-5.2.0.Final.jar
drools-core-5.2.0.Final.jar
drools-compiler-5.2.0.Final.jar
jbpm-flow-5.1.0.Final.jar
jbpm-flow-builder-5.1.0.Final.jar
jbpm-bpmn2-5.1.0.Final.jar
I tried changing the three jbpm jars to
Yes, I got the same exception, you can't remove all listeners from the
outside (at least in 5.2.0.Final), that's why I patched the
AbstractWorkingMemory class to hardcode the listeners removal inside Drools.
But now that I found JBPM 5.1.1.Final that seems to solve the problem in a
better way, the
I'm trying to remove the listeners myself as Edson suggests, but I can't
figure out how to make it work. I added this to my code just to see how
many listeners there were (I expected to see three - one for each of my
flows - based on what I see in the heap dump):
Collection listeners = se
This was fixed recently for 5.3.0.Final
You can use either "multiple field constraints" or "Add more options to this
fields values" (the icon at the end of a field constraint).
On 5 October 2011 16:43, enkidu wrote:
> I've been playing with Drools and Guvnor and think I've encountered a
> p
I've been playing with Drools and Guvnor and think I've encountered a problem
with Java enums in Guvnor. I've searched for previous enum bugs and seen
that a lot have been fixed, but I've tried Guvnor 5.2.0 and 5.3.0.CR1 and it
happens in both.
The problem seems to happen when you use enums in a "
I will check these out today. If you can provide an isolated test case,
it helps, otherwise I will try to reproduce from your info in these e-mails.
Edson
2011/10/5 Wacław Borowiec
> Thanks for the hint Wolfgang, here are the results:
>
> this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0])
>
> gives
Thanks for the hint Wolfgang, here are the results:
this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0])
gives
[Error: unexpected end of statement]
[Near : {... ($constr.getRestrictions () [0]) }]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 33]
at
org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractP
Correction:
EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions () [0] ),...
On 5 October 2011 14:44, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Write this like so:
> EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions[0]),...
> -W
>> part from last line of LHS. Again, it worked well in 5.1.1.
>>
>> On 10/05/20
Write this like so:
EmNumberRestriction(this == ($constr.getRestrictions[0]),...
-W
2011/10/5 Wacław Borowiec
>
> Thanks for your answer Thomas. It showed that this construct works fine
> either way with 5.3.0.CR1, but it's other rule that causes the error:
>
> rule "restriction number paramI
Hi Marc, Mario,
I'm using the same test case on this thread, and oing more tests I now
realized what is the problem, this leak appears only if the pom file has the
dependency to jbpm-bpmn2 5.1.0.Final along with Drools 5.2.x or 5.3.x.
Re-reading Jamie's post earlier I was puzzled by his reference
Thanks for your answer Thomas. It showed that this construct works fine
either way with 5.3.0.CR1, but it's other rule that causes the error:
rule "restriction number paramId: 1, id: 0"
when
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == true)
$def : EmParamDefinition(this == $param.paramDef
Excellent, thanks!
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: 05 October 2011 13:18
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Collecting all items of nested collections /
accumulate nested collections
If I unders
On 5 October 2011 13:27, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Snags like this are due to a completer rework of the DRL parser after
5.1.1.
Snags like this are due to a *complete compiler* rework of the DRL parser
after 5.1.1.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users
For the sake of our readers, I repeat the rule:
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
(def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDis
If I understood it correctly and have not missed a comma or parenthesis:
rule "level three"
when
$l0: Level0()
$list1: List( size > 0 )
from accumulate (Level1( $level1List: level1List) from $l0.level1List,
init( List l = new ArrayList(); )
action( l.addAll($level1List)
Hi Alejandro,
I checked if I could reproduce the memory leak in 5.3 by using the test case
posted in the first email of this thread, but I wasn't able to do that. In
other words it seems to me that all listeners are removed as expected in the
dispose method.
Were you using a different use case t
Why do you need the and in the rule?
Have you tried
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
Hello
I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
visibility in the previous one.
I've got following rule:
rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
salience 50
when
(def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, re
Hi,
I have tried the fault node in drools flow file and it has worked fine
in .rf. Whenever a faultnode is triggered it will search for the fault name
and will be caught at the apropriate Exception Handlers. But When am
implementing the same in .bpmn the fault node is triggered but the flow i
On 04/10/2011 22:51, alopez wrote:
> Good news, I followed your advice and patched drools-core to prevent this,
> focusing on removing all listeners:
>
> AbstractWorkingMemory.java, line 1246:
>
> for ( Iterator it = this.__ruleBaseEventListeners.iterator(); it.hasNext();
> ) {
> this.ruleB
Hello
I've got following rule:
It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
following exception:
It is
line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and the
line
I have a question regarding creating a list of items that are all in
nested collections of my main object.
A high level overview of the model is like this:
public Level0 {
private List level1List;
}
public Level1 {
private List level1List;
}
public Level2 {
private Date occurence;
30 matches
Mail list logo
