Hi all,
There is a small remark/comment that pops into my head when reading this.
Giving the effort that has already been spent on the issue, this might come
a bit late to you, but whatever...
Wouldn't it also be possible to keep your excel decision table exactly the
way it originally was
On 04/06/2012, FrankVhh frank.vanhoensho...@agserv.eu wrote:
Hi all,
There is a small remark/comment that pops into my head when reading this.
Giving the effort that has already been spent on the issue, this might come
a bit late to you, but whatever...
Wouldn't it also be possible to keep
Sorry for the confusion, of course I mean ACTION.
Although I still did not try it, I also get from the documentation that you
would need a column header. The way I see it, there are multiple workarounds
for that. One more ugly than the other, so it's up to you to decide if it's
worth it.
1) As
Hi guys,
We are using JBPM 5 for long running processes in one of our products,
both, the knowledge session and WorkItemInfo ProcessInstanceInfo are
persisted in a PostgreSQL database. Our processes involve a set of
automated tasks along with UserTasks handled inside JBPM's HumanTask
provided
The formula trick works : POI (api used inside drools) is reading values by
default for cells (at least the last time I used that in 5.1 version).
The main problem of this is when users adds new rows : you must ensure that
formula are copied too and this lead to other dirtier tricks (like
Perhaps another (simpler) approach (showing columns as rows):
ACTION || myMap.put(new KeyPojo($1,$2,$3), || 1,22,333
ACTION || $param); || 122333
-W
On 04/06/2012, Vincent LEGENDRE vincent.legen...@eurodecision.com wrote:
The formula trick works : POI (api used inside drools) is
Alberto,
Which versions of Drools and jBPM are you using?
Edson
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Alberto R. Galdo arga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
We are using JBPM 5 for long running processes in one of our products,
both, the knowledge session and WorkItemInfo
Hi,
I tried to add field constraints to the condition and action columns in my
rules. I am using a Decision table (Web guided editor) to input my rules.
Even after adding the constraints I was able to save rules that violated
them. I read in another post that working sets have to be activated
