[rules-users] Is property reactive bug in 5.5 fixed in 6.0
Hi, I am having issues with property reactive causing some rules not to get fired. Looks like someone also encountered this issue in 5.5 and it was agreed to be a bug. I am using 6.0 and was wondering if this bug is fixed. Here is the detail of the property reactive bug in 5.5: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/same-criteria-across-multiple-rules-cancels-activation-with-Property-Reactive-Facts-td4021204.html#a4021208 thanks! Wing Tang -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-property-reactive-bug-in-5-5-fixed-in-6-0-tp4029419.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is property reactive bug in 5.5 fixed in 6.0
not aware of any property reactive bugs, make sure you try master to be sure: http://downloads.jboss.org/drools/release/snapshot/master/ Mark On 4 May 2014, at 21:43, wtang wt...@kana.com wrote: Hi, I am having issues with property reactive causing some rules not to get fired. Looks like someone also encountered this issue in 5.5 and it was agreed to be a bug. I am using 6.0 and was wondering if this bug is fixed. Here is the detail of the property reactive bug in 5.5: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/same-criteria-across-multiple-rules-cancels-activation-with-Property-Reactive-Facts-td4021204.html#a4021208 thanks! Wing Tang -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-property-reactive-bug-in-5-5-fixed-in-6-0-tp4029419.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is property reactive bug in 5.5 fixed in 6.0
if you please could click on the link on the original post, you will see it has Mark Proctor name on it and you were pushing for a fix in future release of 5.5. Please let me know if this bug have been fixed in 6.0. thx, Wing -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-property-reactive-bug-in-5-5-fixed-in-6-0-tp4029419p4029421.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is property reactive bug in 5.5 fixed in 6.0
We did a number of property reactive fixes for 5.6 and 6.0, but I do not know if the one in that mailing list entry was fixed, as they never submitted a unit test to us, as a pull request, as per: I also wrote a page on how to submit unit tests and bug fixes: http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html; Mark On 5 May 2014, at 00:34, wtang wt...@kana.com wrote: if you please could click on the link on the original post, you will see it has Mark Proctor name on it and you were pushing for a fix in future release of 5.5. Please let me know if this bug have been fixed in 6.0. thx, Wing -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-property-reactive-bug-in-5-5-fixed-in-6-0-tp4029419p4029421.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Using dynamic package names with Drools 6.0 Spring integration.
I expect this is functionality that would have to be added to our spring
implementation. An ideal task for someone wanting to contribute to the project:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html
Mark
On 2 May 2014, at 17:17, Sunny Singh mailtosunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to integrate Drools 6.0 with my application using Drools-Spring
integration features.
Issues faced:
I need to define the knowledge bases in a spring context XML and make the
package names to be dynamically passed into the knowledge bases using Spring
Expression Language when the Spring container is created at the start-up.
But, the package names are not being injected into the knowledge base when it
is created by Drools framework.
If I define the package names and hard-code them into the packages property
of the kbase tag, it works.
Could you please let me know if there is a way to make the package names
being passed dynamically passed into the packages property of the kbase
tag. This is because my client application would supply the packages names
when the knowledge bases are setup and I am trying not to hard-code these.
XML Configuration:
bean id=packageRepository class=test.PackageRepository
property name=packages value=packageA,packageB/
/bean
kie:kmodule id=kmodule
kie:kbase name=testKnowledgeBase
packages=#{packageRepository.packages}/
/kie:kmodule
Thanks!
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Is property reactive bug in 5.5 fixed in 6.0
Bugs about @PR were reported and fixed in 5.6 and 6.x The fixes cover the bug described in the original thread. More issues related with @PR were fixed here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-91?jql=project%20%3D%20DROOLS%20AND%20text%20~%20%22property%20reactive%22 If you have encountered a specific problem with one of your rules, please report it. Thanks Davide On 05/04/2014 04:34 PM, wtang wrote: if you please could click on the link on the original post, you will see it has Mark Proctor name on it and you were pushing for a fix in future release of 5.5. Please let me know if this bug have been fixed in 6.0. thx, Wing -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-property-reactive-bug-in-5-5-fixed-in-6-0-tp4029419p4029421.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
