Hey Fantix, nice job !
By the way, if you really have time to spare...MQTT would also be a nice
to have library...for the embeddable sensor domain guys.
A bit about it here:
http://clockwerx.blogspot.com/2014/06/whats-mqtt-and-how-can-you-use-it.html
--
-Thad
+ThadGuidry
Hi,
Here is zmq.rs, a native implementation of ØMQ in the Rust programming
language in MPLv2. I've just got a very ugly prototype running till now,
and I'm expecting to hear more comments on anything.
https://github.com/zeromq/zmq.rs
For who wants to know more about ØMQ, it looks like an
Complaining about something I don't like:
Due to the choice of MPLv2, this won't be usable in the wider Rust
ecosystem, which is MIT/ASL2 focused. In particular, section 3.2(a)
requires that any distribution in Executable Form carry a notice
about how to acquire the source code of zmq.rs. This is
Thank you, Corey!
Honestly I didn't dig deep about licensing. It was MIT which I think is the
most open one as BSD. Then http://zeromq.org/docs:organization suggested
MPLv2 - something between BSD and GPL just sounded also not bad for me,
so I didn't pay much attention changing to MPLv2. I
This is awesome! I look forward to deprecating
https://github.com/erickt/rust-zmq.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Fantix King fantix.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Corey!
Honestly I didn't dig deep about licensing. It was MIT which I think is
the most open one as BSD. Then
On 07/02/2014 03:16 AM, Corey Richardson wrote:
Complaining about something I don't like:
Due to the choice of MPLv2, this won't be usable in the wider Rust
ecosystem, which is MIT/ASL2 focused. In particular, section 3.2(a)
requires that any distribution in Executable Form carry a notice
about
See also the discussion on IRC:
https://botbot.me/mozilla/rust/2014-07-02/?msg=17359232page=22
It wasn't my intention to discourage using any particular license, but
to raise its requirements if they weren't consciously chosen.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:33 PM, SiegeLordEx slab...@aim.com wrote:
