is that the elements in the vector in the rust
code are `uint` (which on most systems is 64-bit) and in the C code you’re
inserting `int`s (32-bits on most systems).
That’s not really a fair contest.
- Clark
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:26 PM, François-Xavier Bourlet bomb...@gmail.com
wrote:
and hitting
On my machine I get:
C: 1,0.509391
rust: 1,0.466069
So rust is faster for me.
For fun, I tried to write the rust version using unsafe and
pre-allocation to remove the second push:
let mut m = Vec::from_fn(101, |_| 0);
let pm = m.as_mut_ptr();
let mut m_idx = 1i;
let t =
, François-Xavier Bourlet
bomb...@gmail.com wrote:
On my machine I get:
C: 1,0.509391
rust: 1,0.466069
So rust is faster for me.
For fun, I tried to write the rust version using unsafe and
pre-allocation to remove the second push:
let mut m = Vec::from_fn(101, |_| 0);
let pm
Hi,
My little understanding is that the compiler has some sort of priority on
type inference depending of the kind of modification applied to the type in
order to match anything.
Rust can auto-deref on the . operator and auto-borrow when passing to
reference parameters, and I suspect that an
Same here, I am highly interested in the topic.
On Jul 5, 2014 10:14 AM, Nat Pryce nat.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been trying to write tasks that wait for both I/O and channel
communication. I've been told that, to maximise communication performance,
channels do not support selecting of both
Isn't:
type my_convonluted_type = ArcExclusiveVecBoxBufferT;
The most common way to avoid retyping long definition? one could also
pretty indent the type definition for readability, since it will be
defined once.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Benjamin Herr b...@0x539.de wrote:
I realize
In short:
- everybody wants checked integer arithmetic because it helps to
write better code (thanks to compile time and runtime errors)
- nobody wants to pay the price in performances, but maybe in the
future, hardware++ will make it easier... or so on...
What about:
- Defining safe integer
You had my curiosity. But now you have my attention.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
Dearest Rustlers,
Today I'm super-excited to announce that Mozilla has arranged to develop a
world-class package manager for Rust. Yehuda Katz and Carl Lerche,
damned, my gmail client was not up to date, you've got a better answer
already (I got the ref keyword right at least ;))
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:00 PM, François-Xavier Bourlet
bomb...@gmail.com wrote:
match global_data {
Some(data) =
You should be able to do:
Some(ref data
