Re: [rust-dev] owned pointer vs. owning pointer vs. owned box
Thank you very much. So, does the Pointer Guide need to be updated? -- Masanori Ogino http://twitter.com/omasanori http://gplus.to/omasanori ___ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
Re: [rust-dev] owned pointer vs. owning pointer vs. owned box
On 20/05/14 07:41 PM, Liigo Zhuang wrote: > Could you show us the memory layout of Box? Thank you! The memory layout is just a pointer to a dynamic allocation with the size of the value. Providing the dynamic allocation is up to the default allocator, which is jemalloc right now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
Re: [rust-dev] owned pointer vs. owning pointer vs. owned box
Could you show us the memory layout of Box? Thank you! 2014年5月21日 上午6:59于 "Daniel Micay" 写道： > On 20/05/14 06:45 PM, Masanori Ogino wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I found that the Reference Manual uses the term "owning pointer", the > > Pointer Guide and liballoc do "owned pointer" and Tutorial does "owned > box". > > > > Which term is canonical today? > > > > -- > > Masanori Ogino masanori.og...@gmail.com>> > > http://twitter.com/omasanori > > http://gplus.to/omasanori > > Either owned box (a dynamic allocation owned by a pointer) or owning > pointer (a pointer owning a dynamic allocation) is accurate. On the > other hand, the term 'owned pointer' doesn't make sense as even > references and `Rc` are an owned *pointer*, but the ownership > relationship doesn't pass through them. > > > ___ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > > ___ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
Re: [rust-dev] owned pointer vs. owning pointer vs. owned box
See https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/The-Rusticon for an up-to-date glossary and syntax reference. On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 20/05/14 06:45 PM, Masanori Ogino wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I found that the Reference Manual uses the term "owning pointer", the >> Pointer Guide and liballoc do "owned pointer" and Tutorial does "owned box". >> >> Which term is canonical today? >> >> -- >> Masanori Ogino mailto:masanori.og...@gmail.com>> >> http://twitter.com/omasanori >> http://gplus.to/omasanori > > Either owned box (a dynamic allocation owned by a pointer) or owning > pointer (a pointer owning a dynamic allocation) is accurate. On the > other hand, the term 'owned pointer' doesn't make sense as even > references and `Rc` are an owned *pointer*, but the ownership > relationship doesn't pass through them. > > > ___ > Rust-dev mailing list > Rust-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > -- http://octayn.net/ ___ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
Re: [rust-dev] owned pointer vs. owning pointer vs. owned box
On 20/05/14 06:45 PM, Masanori Ogino wrote: > Hello. > > I found that the Reference Manual uses the term "owning pointer", the > Pointer Guide and liballoc do "owned pointer" and Tutorial does "owned box". > > Which term is canonical today? > > -- > Masanori Ogino mailto:masanori.og...@gmail.com>> > http://twitter.com/omasanori > http://gplus.to/omasanori Either owned box (a dynamic allocation owned by a pointer) or owning pointer (a pointer owning a dynamic allocation) is accurate. On the other hand, the term 'owned pointer' doesn't make sense as even references and `Rc` are an owned *pointer*, but the ownership relationship doesn't pass through them. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
[rust-dev] owned pointer vs. owning pointer vs. owned box
Hello. I found that the Reference Manual uses the term "owning pointer", the Pointer Guide and liballoc do "owned pointer" and Tutorial does "owned box". Which term is canonical today? -- Masanori Ogino http://twitter.com/omasanori http://gplus.to/omasanori ___ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
