Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
> BRCM OFDPA can support it although it has limited usage.
> BigSwitch also has it on oftest code.
>
> I know standard don't specify it has mask on in_port.
> But I think it doesn't obey standard. Standard just define a framework.
> If Openflow agent can support it,
BRCM OFDPA can support it although it has limited usage.
BigSwitch also has it on oftest code.
I know standard don't specify it has mask on in_port.
But I think it doesn't obey standard. Standard just define a framework.
If Openflow agent can support it, I think can use it.
-Original Message
Hi,
Thank you for your patch,
but I think the in_port match field is defined as "No Masked" field in OpenFlow
Spec 1.3.4.
On my environment, OVS returns OFPErrorMsg with the following error type and
code.
type: OFPET_BAD_MATCH(4)
code: OFPBMC_BAD_MASK(8)
Does your switch supports "masked" in_
Hi,
On 2015年09月07日 07:25, Samuele Redaelli wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am testing the group table feature with Ryu. My test environment is Mininet
> 2.2.1 with ovswitch 2.3.1.
> I have a very simple topology with 3 host connected to a single switch. My
> attempt is to send data from host1 to t
Attach is my added. It pass “run-test.sh”.
I don’t know how to contribute the code, so I put here.
add-inport-has-mask-fileld
Description: add-inport-has-mask-fileld
--
___
Ryu-
Hi everybody,
I am testing the group table feature with Ryu. My test environment is
Mininet 2.2.1 with ovswitch 2.3.1.
I have a very simple topology with 3 host connected to a single switch. My
attempt is to send data from host1 to the other two host. I install the
following group rule (by using t
