Please Ignore this email
Its not complete.
Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Taha Khan wrote:
> Hi Iwase,
>
> I have a triangle topology as shown below. I have followed steps as shown
> in RYU documentation and the interface router addresses are also same
> except I have added a link b
.yusu...@gmail.com <mailto:iwase.yusu...@gmail.com>>>
Date: 2017/11/21 01:38 (GMT-05:00)
To: mailfort...@gmail.com <mailto:mailfort...@gmail.com>
<mailto:mailfort...@gmail.com
<mailto:mailfort...@gmail.com>>
Cc: ryu-devel@lists.sourcef
t; using the API
>> call(/8080/router/0001). I also doubt the conflict
>> because stp is layer 2 whereas
>> rest_router is layer3, hence I assume they should act independently.
>> Although, if that’s the
>> case what could be the alternative?
>>
>
forge.net <mailto:ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Ryu-devel] Setting Default Routes in custom topology.
Hi Taha,
I guess simple_switch_stp_13 and rest_router cannot work together because
these apps are just
sample applications for Ryu-Book
(http://osrg.github.io/ryu-
fort...@gmail.com
> Cc: ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ryu-devel] Setting Default Routes in custom topology.
>
> Hi Taha,
>
> I guess simple_switch_stp_13 and rest_router cannot work together because
> these apps are just
> sample applications for Ryu-Book (htt
Hi Taha,
I guess simple_switch_stp_13 and rest_router cannot work together because these
apps are just
sample applications for Ryu-Book
(http://osrg.github.io/ryu-book/en/html/index.html).
For example, rest_router assumes packets should be process in the pipeline, but
does not aware
of the flo