[S-nail] "Unterminated account definition", etc.

I am still using heirloom mailx, but as it is acting a bit flaky under my new OS, I thought I would try S-nail. I compiled the recent version 14.6.4, and upon executing, I receive the messages: Unterminated account definition: "gmail". "Source" stack over-pop. No mail for jjurek "jjurek"

Re: [S-nail] "Unterminated account definition", etc.

omar.abo...@malix.univ-paris1.fr (Omar Aboura) writes: > > You should delete the empty lines. And the solution was that simple. Thanks! -- Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.

[S-nail] Authentication issue

Members of the list: I have run into a problem migrating from heirloom-mailx to s-nail. When sending a message under heirloom-mailx, after I would hit control-D, I would be prompted for the password, I would enter it, the mail would be sent and all would be fine. With s-nail, when hitting

Re: [S-nail] Authentication issue

Gavin Troy writes: > > The missing ingredient is probably "set smtp-auth=plain", > as the default is now "none". That was the ticket. I am now prompted for the password. Thanks. -- Download BIRT

Re: [S-nail] Authentication issue

Steffen Nurpmeso writes: > > Dear Josef, first of all it is good to know that S-nail users can > still access gmail.com from within the command line! All *i* can > see is along > [...] > But whatever i do, this won't go away. > (It seems that Google always classifies my

[S-mailx] gmail access past May 30

Hello Since 2010, I have used various versions of nail, heirloom mailx, and s-nail to access my gmail account. Currently, I am using "heirloom mailx 12.5", though I have "s-nail 14.9.23" running on my system and I could switch to that. However, recently, Google has announced the following:

Re: [S-mailx] gmail access past May 30

Mr. Nurpmeso: Thank you for your detailed response. Steffen Nurpmeso writes: > > Just call back if after the FAQ there remain questions, Josef!! And thank you for this kind offer. >From what I can tell so far, I think I will be using s-nail and trying to get oauthbearer authentication to

[S-mailx] FWD: Help with my .mailrc

> Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:47:46 +0200 > From: Steffen Nurpmeso > To: josef.ju...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Help with my .mailrc Hello Josef. War das nicht auch Deutsch?? josef.ju...@gmail.com wrote in <628d9b6b.IF8q613EtFruF4ZC%jurek@computer-room01>: |I wonder if I can trouble you with

[S-mailx] Working with s-nail 14.9.24 on Fedora

I am running Fedora 35. s-nail 14.9.23 is in the Fedora repository, is installed on my machine and is currently working well to access my gmail account. However, to better work OAuth, Mr. Nurpmeso suggested that I install s-nail 14.9.24. 14.9.24 compiles for me, but when executed, it cannot

Re: [S-mailx] Working with s-nail 14.9.24 on Fedora

And the packages I was missing were: openssl-devel krb5-devel libidn2-devel 14.9.24 is now working on my system! Thank you Steffen! Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > You may need a development package for OpenSSL installed. > >

Re: [S-mailx] gmail access past May 30

Hello Mr. Nurpmeso: Steffen Nurpmeso writes: > > By sheer luck i saw on the OpenBSD port ML a new port request for > cyrus-sasl-xoauth2, and out of interest that lead me to [1], which > is a good instruction, much better than the short FAQ entry of us. > > With the info from [1] and the

[S-mailx] "App password" or "OAuth 2.0"

Hello: Since GoogleMail introduced their new authentication on May 30 2022, I have been unable to access GoogleMail with s-nail-14.9.24. I have read the "OAuth 2.0" thread of Oct 2022 between Steffen Nurpmeso and Stephen Isard. If I understand correctly, my two options to access GoogleMail with