Re: [s3ql] max-obj-size with OpenStack / Swift

On Apr 20 2015, Hans Reinders wrote: > Hello, > > When using s3ql for backup purpose of files (movies) with size of 1 - 2 GB, > is it possible / advisable to increase the max-obj-size to a very high > value (say 1GB)? Possible yes. Advisable I'm not sure. > Because it will be only for backing

[s3ql] max-obj-size with OpenStack / Swift

Hello, When using s3ql for backup purpose of files (movies) with size of 1 - 2 GB, is it possible / advisable to increase the max-obj-size to a very high value (say 1GB)? Because it will be only for backing up, the download granularity argument isn't the case. It also seems to me deduplication

Re: [s3ql] Re: Preventing huge network traffic

On Apr 20 2015, Viktor Szépe wrote: > Thank you for your answer. Honestly I have a huge list of criteria > https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/tree/master/backup#backup-criteria-list > and I'm planning combine obnam > with s3ql

Re: [s3ql] Re: Preventing huge network traffic

Hi Viktor, When replying to emails on this list, please do not put your reply above the quoted text, and do not quote the entire message you're answering to. This makes it unnecessarily hard for other readers to understand the context of your email. Instead, please cut quoted parts that are not re

Re: [s3ql] Re: Preventing huge network traffic

So obnam --keep=14d,3m,1y is equivalent to expire_backups.py 14 90 365 ? On Monday, April 20, 2015 at 6:26:45 PM UTC+2, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > > [Quoting repaired] > > On Apr 20 2015, Viktor Szépe > wrote: > > On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 10:53:05 AM UTC+2, Viktor Szépe wrote: > >> > >> I

[s3ql] Re: Preventing huge network traffic

Thank you for your answer. Honestly I have a huge list of criteria https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/tree/master/backup#backup-criteria-list and I'm planning combine obnam with s3ql. I would leave obnam behind but is has this

Re: [s3ql] Re: Preventing huge network traffic

[Quoting repaired] On Apr 20 2015, Viktor Szépe wrote: > On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 10:53:05 AM UTC+2, Viktor Szépe wrote: >> >> Is there a way to upload only changed file, thus doing incremental backup? >> My usecase is making backup of a website that has 1 or two new files per >> backup. >

Re: [s3ql] Can I move a FS to another bucket?

On Apr 20 2015, Rich B wrote: > Hello, > I've been using Google Storage for my backend for a while now and decided > to experiment with their new "near line" storage. > I tried using gsutil to copy the contents of my s3ql bucket to a new > nearline bucket. I updated my authinfo2 file, but the mo

[s3ql] Can I move a FS to another bucket?

Hello, I've been using Google Storage for my backend for a while now and decided to experiment with their new "near line" storage. I tried using gsutil to copy the contents of my s3ql bucket to a new nearline bucket. I updated my authinfo2 file, but the moved filesystem won't fsck: $ fsck.s3ql

[s3ql] Re: Preventing huge network traffic

Excuse me that was a wrong question. The right one is: Will s3ql read the file's contents to determine whether it has change or reads only the file's metadata (mtime, size etc.)? On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 10:53:05 AM UTC+2, Viktor Szépe wrote: > > Is there a way to upload only changed file,