Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage combinat queue broken

2010-05-16 Thread Anne Schilling
Anne Schilling wrote: Anne Schilling wrote: Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:15:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: I disabled several of your patches in the queue since they had import loops and hence one could not launch sage anymore ...

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage combinat queue broken

2010-05-16 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:46:28PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: It seems that you broke the sage-combinat queue again since sage does not start after applying your latest patches. To be more precise, sage does not run any more after applying your patch

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage combinat queue broken

2010-05-15 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:15:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: I disabled several of your patches in the queue since they had import loops and hence one could not launch sage anymore ... trac_8881-functorial_constructions-nt.patch #+disabled ... trac_8890-free_module-cleanup-nt.patch

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage combinat queue broken

2010-05-15 Thread Anne Schilling
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:15:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: I disabled several of your patches in the queue since they had import loops and hence one could not launch sage anymore ... trac_8881-functorial_constructions-nt.patch #+disabled ...

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage combinat queue broken

2010-05-15 Thread Anne Schilling
Anne Schilling wrote: Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:15:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: I disabled several of your patches in the queue since they had import loops and hence one could not launch sage anymore ... trac_8881-functorial_constructions-nt.patch #+disabled

[sage-combinat-devel] sage combinat queue broken

2010-05-14 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Nicolas, I disabled several of your patches in the queue since they had import loops and hence one could not launch sage anymore ... trac_8881-functorial_constructions-nt.patch #+disabled ... trac_8890-free_module-cleanup-nt.patch #+disabled ... trac_7980-multiple-realizations-nt.patch

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat queue broken

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 07:30:42PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: I have trouble with the sage-combinat queue with sage-4.3.2. I fixed some strange symbols at the beginning of the series file, Yup, my fault. Adrien stumbled on it, and I fixed it and pushed. but I still get this error. There is

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat queue broken

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:59:47AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Sébastien forgot to add/push this patch. He'll do it at the end of Jean Michel's talk. The queue is fixed! Thanks Sébastien! Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat queue broken

2010-02-22 Thread Anne Schilling
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:59:47AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: Sébastien forgot to add/push this patch. He'll do it at the end of Jean Michel's talk. The queue is fixed! Thanks Sébastien! Hi, Are you sure it is fixed? It is still broken for me. The

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat queue broken

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:55:25AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: Are you sure it is fixed? It is still broken for me. The sage-4.3.4.patch is not there applying sage-4.3.4.patch unable to read sage-4.3.4.patch now at: trac_8232_word_cmp_bug-sl.patch Perhaps I'll just add an empty file

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat queue broken

2010-02-22 Thread Anne Schilling
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:55:25AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: Are you sure it is fixed? It is still broken for me. The sage-4.3.4.patch is not there applying sage-4.3.4.patch unable to read sage-4.3.4.patch now at: trac_8232_word_cmp_bug-sl.patch Perhaps I'll just

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat queue broken

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:18:02AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: Mercurial seems to tell that you both added the file. Luckily the merging went file, so that's fine indeed :-) I assume the two modifications were not yet merged when you ran into the issue? I cannot see that there were two