On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Ursula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's actually really easy to tell GAP how to use a subdirectory of
your home directory for additional packages: you create a directory
called pkg , and then you start GAP using the command
gap -l 'path/homedir;'
where
Nice work!
Haven't been able to try it yet, the download link seems to be dead
for me as well, though the server is alive according to ping.
On Jul 15, 6:48 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 14 Jul, 23:25, mabshoff [EMAIL
On Jul 15, 11:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice work!
Haven't been able to try it yet, the download link seems to be dead
for me as well, though the server is alive according to ping.
Odd, I just checked and
On Jul 13, 1:57 pm, saucerful [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see. Yes I agree it should be false. Consider:
CIF(RIF(0)) != CIF(RIF(-1, 1))
True
RIF(0, 0) != RIF(-1, 1)
False
That these two comparisons should be different makes no sense, does
it?
Yes, there's probably a bug here, and it's
I like 3. It probably makes the most sense because its the behavior is
simplest to define/remember, and (in)equality is by far the most
important anyway.
On Jul 16, 2:44 am, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 1:57 pm, saucerful [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see. Yes I agree it
On 15 Jul, 23:48, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to ls -l, the file is 139557984 bytes long. Here's the
checksum:
$ digest -v -a md5 sage-3.0.5-sse3-i86pc--SunOS_BETA.tar.gz
md5
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ursula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the copy of Sage installed on sage.math.washington.edu from
the command line. I do not have root access.
I would like to use some commands which require the optional package
gap_packages-4.4.10_4 . Because I don't
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 06:57:57 pm Chris Swierczewski wrote:
My Question (Finally): How do I go about wrapping this C++ class with
this strange little define hanging around the class declaration?
Methinks I'm having compile issues precisely because of this addition.
I checked the Cython wiki
On Jul 16, 1:37 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ursula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the copy of Sage installed on sage.math.washington.edu from
the command line. I do not have root access.
I would like to use some commands which
On Jul 16, 12:24 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just to let you know: For some reason all the public Sage notebooks on
sage.math are down. Since William is off the grid and I have no
documentation how to
Recently I came across SLOCCount [1]. It claims to count source code
lines correctly (heuristics, comments, detects duplicate files,...)
and estimates the cost to develop it. It seems to don't know cython,
but I still want to share this ;-)
Maybe someone wants to play with it and tweak it to work
What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm
wondering whether to bother building the latter having just done the
former.
John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm
wondering whether to bother building the latter having just done the
former.
A few tiny fixes for certain obscure architectures were added and some
Thanks!
I hope you enjoy your European trip, though it's a pity that our
paths will not cross this time.
John
2008/7/16 William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:40 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm
wondering whether to bother building the latter having just done the
On Jul 16, 1:33 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 15 Jul, 23:48, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to ls -l, the file is 139557984 bytes long. Here's the
checksum:
Hi David,
$ digest -v -a md5
Joel,
Do you have control of the CFLAGS that are passed to the compiler (presumably
gcc) which compiles the cython generated code? If so, you can use the -D
switch to define the __LINUX identifier.
Yes. Just to clarify, I've been able to compile by setting this flag
and simply typing
I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation
of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already
there). You can find our current code at
http://sage-words.googlecode.com/ if you are interested.
We started out using as little as possible from the Sage
On Jul 16, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation
of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already
there). You can find our current code at
http://sage-words.googlecode.com/ if you are interested.
We
Hi Arnaud,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation
of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already
there). You can find our current code at
Hi,
I hit the following doctest failure in Sage 3.0.5/3.0.6.alpha0:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py
**
File /scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.0.6.alpha0/tmp/ssmod.py,
line 14:
sage: D[:3]
Expected:
This is bad, in the sense that it's wrong. What machine was this
happening on? Did you try running this same test 100 or so times with
3.0.3 (before the new FLINT)?
It might be worth upgrading FLINT anyway -- someone else could be
hitting the same corner case, maybe in a non-doctest fashion ...
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Craig Citro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is bad, in the sense that it's wrong. What machine was this
happening on?
in my case it's AMD Athlon from Barton age, there's cpuinfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model
On Jul 16, 6:49 pm, Andrzej Giniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Craig Citro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is bad, in the sense that it's wrong. What machine was this
happening on?
in my case it's AMD Athlon from Barton age, there's cpuinfo:
I
The last build I built from source (3.0.3) took ~ 3 hours total on my
average dell laptop (running kubuntu 8.0.4.1). Building 3.0.5 is
ongoing, but has spent the last 5+ hours on zn_poly tuning program.
Is this normal? It hasn't stalled, but has effectively tripled the
compilation time (at
On Jul 16, 8:39 pm, tkeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The last build I built from source (3.0.3) took ~ 3 hours total on my
average dell laptop (running kubuntu 8.0.4.1). Building 3.0.5 is
ongoing, but has spent the last 5+ hours on zn_poly tuning program.
Is this normal? It hasn't
Hello folks,
this is 3.0.6.alpha0. This release is a mix of bug fixes and new
features. Nothing crazy has been merged so far and it is unclear at
the moment how things will develop until ISSAC. I have a bunch of
Solaris build fixes sitting on my box that have not been merged due to
lack of time
I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed
this message:
Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18)
KS mul: ...
KS sqr: ...
Nussbaumer mul: ...
Nussbaumer sqr:
On Jul 16, 8:54 pm, tkeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed
this message:
Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18)
KS mul: ...
KS sqr: ...
Nussbaumer mul:
2008/7/16 Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnaud,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation
of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already
there). You can find our
Sage 3.0.3 definitely built from source for me 3ish weeks ago. I've
applied suggested Debian/Ubuntu updates since then (nothing too
radical sticks out) , but I'll trying rebuilding 3.0.3 tomorrow
morning. Thanks much for your responses.
Regards,
Thomas
On Jul 16, 10:59 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL
31 matches
Mail list logo
