I guess William writes Weierstrass more often than hierarchy
John
On 1 Feb, 00:42, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi William,
On 31 Jan., 19:04, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Thanks! I was scared you were going to point out 10 typos :-)
I found one:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some time now.
-bash-3.2$ maple
|\^/| Maple 12 (X86 64 LINUX)
._|\| |/|_. Copyright (c) Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple
Inc. 2008
\
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some time now.
It should print a deprecation warning so I would know. Could
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some
On sage-support (http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/
browse_frm/thread/f62e4f521d732b60) I pointed out that mat.rank()
failed for a certain sparse matrix, whereas mat.dense_matrix().rank()
worked just fine, and similarly for mat.elementary_divisors().
On Jan 31, 12:12 pm, mabshoff
On Feb 1, 2009, at 4:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2009, at 4:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just want to point out
As always, please let me know if you use this, find bugs, or would
like features. A big thanks to Matthias for contributing to the effort!
Hi Nick,
I just tried out sage-mode for the first time (gasp) and I'm quite please. One
thing I'm missing from my normal shell is that when I type,
On Feb 1, 12:46 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox times imply. The linalg package has been obsolete
for some time now.
Hello all,
As of today, Sage 3.0.5 is available in Debian sid, so you can now run
apt-get install sagemath and get Sage installed on your Debian
system[1].
However, the sage package has bitrotted substantially during the 7 months
it was hanging out in the NEW queue, so I'd not count on it to
On Feb 1, 4:23 pm, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Hello all,
Hi Tim,
As of today, Sage 3.0.5 is available in Debian sid, so you can now run
apt-get install sagemath and get Sage installed on your Debian
system[1].
Excellent.
However, the sage package has bitrotted substantially
On Feb 1, 1:08 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
SNIP
Pari seems rather inefficient when the above sparse matrix requires
more than 2GB Ram to compute. The sparse matrix code needs a good
cleanup anyway.
I agree, and I absolutely do not volunteer to do this.
On Feb 1, 1:26 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Maple's Linear Algebra is noted for not being particularly good at large
sizes. With symbolic entries, it's much worse. Thanks for these timings,
it just reinforces my idea that I should switch as soon as the calculus
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 12:46 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to point out the Maple's linear algebra is not quite as
bad as old Linbox
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, most of the work for Sage computing dets uses IML,
not Linbox.
IML is very good. The algorithms are good :) I'm not sure what Magma
is doing, but if I had to guess, I'd say they are solving a system
AX=B
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev using Emcas [which for the
record is canonically wrong since vim is the superior editor, but all
you Emacs users
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
default Sage? Given the number of Sage dev using Emcas [which for the
record is
On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular reason not to include Nick's code with
default Sage? Given the
On Feb 1, 9:21 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 4:44 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Can you default it to LinBox in your case and report if LinBox causes
trouble either by throwing an error or by producing wrong results?
I don't think I can.
On Feb 1, 9:19 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Well, given the fact that we will likely soon ship SageTeX with Sage
itself is there any particular
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:32 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 9:19 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1-Feb-09, at 8:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Well, given the fact that we
21 matches
Mail list logo
