On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:13 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
3. I would also like to see the default symbolics switch from
maxima-based to pynac, which would I think really clearly justify the
switch to 4.0, since it will have a *dramatic* impact on the usability
of Sage by many
Hi.
memtest86+ reports some memory errors...
I'm going to fix that.
Thorough inspection of my SCSI hard drive (badblocks -w
+ the adaptec tool) doesn't report any problem.
I've of course tried to install first a prebuild sage binary,
but unfortunately my processor doesn't support some
sse*
Hi Golam,
It seems that you and Jason are getting a firm grip on this, which is
great. Just out of curiosity and my ignorance of the underlying code: Is
your aim to hard-code certain functions, or is your aim to provide the
users with the possibility of defining the latex representation of
This is the amazing thing about Sage and an attribute of good
software: you don't need to understand every detail in order to use it
productively. And it motivates you to learn more and explore unknown
fields such as mathematics. :)
I just spoke to a Geography professor who said that it would be
On Mar 26, 5:07 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, I will not merge a second implementation as long as there is no
clear roadmap for resolving the problem.
The basic functionality of Mike's powerseries class is also contained
in my class.
That is add, multiply, power,
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:17:19 -0700
Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:13 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
3. I would also like to see the default symbolics switch from
maxima-based to pynac, which would I think really clearly justify
the switch
I don't mean to be pessimistic, but perhaps its more realistic to
imagine sage days 15 as a time to try to wrap up the symbolics
switch. My impression is that there aren't that many people who feel
qualified and have the time to work on the switch, and that seems hard
to change except at a sage
On Mar 23, 2009, at 5:39 PM, ulfarsson wrote:
would it be possible to make the notebook files clickable in the
following sense:
If I have a file test.sws at /user/Documents/mySAGEfiles that I click
then SAGE opens a new
session by opening up a notebook server using the files at /user/
On Mar 26, 1:18 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi William,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:13 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
At a minimum, Sage-4.0 will be the following:
1. doctest coverage of the core Sage library at 75%
I've been working on the doctest
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a list of changes needed in pynac on the wiki. Here is the
link (though the wiki seems to be down at the moment):
Not just the wiki:
www.sagemath.org
Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
My impression is that there aren't that many people who feel
qualified and have the time to work on the switch, and that seems hard
to change except at a sage days.
I bet there are at least 3 people reading this
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Henryk Trappmann
bo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 5:07 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, I will not merge a second implementation as long as there is no
clear roadmap for resolving the problem.
The basic functionality of Mike's
On Mar 26, 3:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Make sure your code has 100% doctest coverage.
I have two questions here.
1. I work intensely with functions defined inside of methods (because
one attribute of the power series is a function. It needs to be
defined whenever a method
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Henryk Trappmann
bo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 3:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Make sure your code has 100% doctest coverage.
I have two questions here.
1. I work intensely with functions defined inside of methods (because
one
wst...@sage:~/build/sage-3.4/devel/sage/sage$ sage -coverage .
Overall weighted coverage score: 65.3%
Total number of functions: 22425
Here is the breakdown by file:
Great - thanks!
Now that you just looked that over, what can you help on?
Oh, I think I'll find something :)
Why
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
I think at this point, it'd be good to post a patch so that we can all
see the full change. Do you know how to make a patch with mercurial?
Have you been using version control to save your changes?
Frankly,
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
I think at this point, it'd be good to post a patch so that we can all
see the full change. Do you know how to make a patch with mercurial?
Have you been using version control
Hi Stan,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com
It seems that you and Jason are getting a firm grip on this, which is
great. Just out of curiosity and my ignorance of the underlying code: Is
your aim to hard-code certain functions, or is your aim to provide the
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:11:39 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Jason: I am attaching the patch for enhancing typesetting of
functions. I need to add doc-tests though. In the patch, I have
implemented all the situations that I planned to do.
Apart from the
http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
Missing Sage?
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Another one:
http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Math/Software/
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
Missing Sage?
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
Another one:
http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Math/Software/
That includes sage.
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
Missing Sage?
You should
On 26 Mrz., 09:10, bourbabis bourba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
memtest86+ reports some memory errors...
I'm going to fix that.
Thorough inspection of my SCSI hard drive (badblocks -w
+ the adaptec tool) doesn't report any problem.
I've of course tried to install first a prebuild sage
On Mar 26, 3:17 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
Another one:
http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Math/Software/
That includes sage.
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Burcin,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
5. Recurse nicely with subscripts.
How is your function different, apart from the fact that you don't
process suffixes recursively?
In one sentence: the new function returns False for un-told situations
I found this article on Python performance improvement interesting:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
Google's goal appears to be a 5x performance improvement in Python.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Daryl Hammond dhamm...@aol.com wrote:
I found this article on Python performance improvement interesting:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
Google's goal appears to be a 5x
I read the article with excitement, but unfortunately that article is
total BS -- it's reporting at its worst, and then some. The actual
project that article is about
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
seems to be massively misrepresented by the arstechnica
Hi,
when some python command returns a unicode output (e.g. sympy's
prettyprinter), it shows nice in the notebook. However, when I save
it, go out, then load it again, I can see some mess (however, if I
evaluate all cells, it looks good again). The same happens when I
publish the sheet, so it
This should be fixed if you apply the patches in #4547 + #5211.
Alternatively, you can workaround it by manually choosing encoding in
the web browser as UTF-8 (View|Character encoding in firefox).
I'm running 3.4+those patches in a production server and it seems to
be working ok. I need to use
30 matches
Mail list logo
