ok, that makes a bit more sense as to why it happens. but there ought
to be indeed a better solution...
On Sep 7, 10:41 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 11:02:21AM -0700, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
I don't know enough python to tell for sure, but
Hi,
I was surfing the web for a moment and found this:
http://math.bbcda.de/contents/log/?p=3
It's basically somebody in Germany talking about making a web-based
Mathcad-like program. They talk a lot about what they want and also
about Sage, and how it relates to their interests.
The
Hi
This issue is unresolved for me: users running sage -t in a system-wide
install owned by root.
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:49:28PM +1000, Minh Nguyen wrote:
This issue is now ticket #6861
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6861
# give write permissions to everyone, same as /tmp/
0
Hi folks,
Anyone for Sage and the Digital Signature Algorithm? Here's a post on it at
http://amca01.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/the-digital-signature-algorithm-in-maxima-and-sage/
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
2009/9/7 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
As you know, we are having some problems building ECL on 64-bit OS X (on
the machine bsd.math.washington.edu).
Yes, I have seen the emails. I am trying different builds here in my
laptop, since I did not ask
On Sep 8, 7:38 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
It seems that in OS X, when using gcc to link the object files into
an executable, the flag -m64 is needed _again_ to specify that it is a
64-bits build. This is regarding David's question in
Answer to (2) below. I am VERY please that someone is at last doing
this!
On Sep 8, 1:27 am, Sebastian Pancratz s...@pancratz.org wrote:
Dear all,
I've finally started to work on this, and as already pointed out
earlier it's under trac ticket #4000. Martin Albrecht implemented a
prototype
With 4.1.2.alpha1, I'm seeing the same error reported by John Palmieri:
Well, now it seems to have built on 64-bit as well. It doesn't work
if I first execute
export MAKE='make -j2'
but it works if MAKE='make'. Here's the tail end of the installation
with MAKE='make -j2'; I think I get a
On Sep 8, 10:34 am, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
With 4.1.2.alpha1, I'm seeing the same error reported by John Palmieri:
Well, now it seems to have built on 64-bit as well. It doesn't work
if I first execute
export MAKE='make -j2'
ECL's makefiles do not work well with -jn (n=2) In
This seems really odd to me. I expected to get back n() applied to each
element of the list.
sage: n([1,2])
1.00 + 2.00*I
Does anyone else find this behavior uncomfortable?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Grout
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
It built OK on Ubuntu 8.10 on Intel.
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/randstate.pyx
Details:
sage -t -long
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:58:38 -0500
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
This seems really odd to me. I expected to get back n() applied to
each element of the list.
sage: n([1,2])
1.00 + 2.00*I
Does anyone else find this behavior uncomfortable?
I
Hi Jason,
On Sep 8, 10:58 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
This seems really odd to me. I expected to get back n() applied to each
element of the list.
sage: n([1,2])
1.00 + 2.00*I
Does anyone else find this behavior uncomfortable?
Not I, at
Simon King wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Sep 8, 10:58 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
This seems really odd to me. I expected to get back n() applied to each
element of the list.
sage: n([1,2])
1.00 + 2.00*I
Does anyone else find this behavior
Hi Burcin,
On Sep 8, 11:21 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
I would call it a bug, a side effect of trying to convert the argument
to a complex number as a last resort.
No, it is documented, at least implicitly. From the doc string of n:
INPUT:
- ``x`` - an object
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Kevin Hortonkhorto...@rogers.com wrote:
It built OK on Ubuntu 8.10 on Intel.
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py
sage -t -long
Simon King wrote:
Hi Burcin,
On Sep 8, 11:21 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
I would call it a bug, a side effect of trying to convert the argument
to a complex number as a last resort.
No, it is documented, at least implicitly. From the doc string of n:
INPUT:
2009/9/8 Juanjo juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com:
On Sep 8, 10:34 am, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
With 4.1.2.alpha1, I'm seeing the same error reported by John Palmieri:
Well, now it seems to have built on 64-bit as well. It doesn't work
if I first execute
export MAKE='make
On Sep 8, 6:36 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Kevin Hortonkhorto...@rogers.com wrote:
It built OK on Ubuntu 8.10 on Intel.
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
sage -t
I like the interface and the idea.
From the first look I don't see the reason to develop new software. It
could be a good interface to Sage mathematics.
The best thing I like about it is the ability to write A4 mathematical
document straight away in the browser and do the formatting as well.
On Sep 8, 12:48 pm, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
From what I understand, ecl is bascially an interpreter for maxima. In
which case, I suspect the fact it is 32-bit will have little effect
unless one wished to alloate a lot of memory. Most programs in Solaris
are compiled as
Hi,
On Sep 7, 3:17 pm, Michael Brickenstein brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
Am 07.09.2009 um 14:34 schrieb Oleksandr:
What about Sage implementation for
1. weighting vector(s) a(w1, w2...wn),
2. free module orderings (e.g. c/C) mixed somewhere in between? Does
Sage have such a concept?
I
Hi Oleksandr!
Am 08.09.2009 um 15:25 schrieb Oleksandr:
Hi,
On Sep 7, 3:17 pm, Michael Brickenstein brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
Am 07.09.2009 um 14:34 schrieb Oleksandr:
What about Sage implementation for
1. weighting vector(s) a(w1, w2...wn),
2. free module orderings (e.g. c/C) mixed
Hi Michael,
On Sep 8, 3:33 pm, Michael Brickenstein brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
Am 08.09.2009 um 15:25 schrieb Oleksandr:
On Sep 7, 3:17 pm, Michael Brickenstein brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
Am 07.09.2009 um 14:34 schrieb Oleksandr:
What about Sage implementation for
1. weighting
Hi,
I am seeking opinion from sage-devel about the following
issue on #6756. You can read the comments at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6756
In brief, new *diff* implementation has an option (not the default behaviour)
by which an user can request to apply chain rule even with
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:18 AM,
Juanjojuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 12:48 pm, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
From what I understand, ecl is bascially an interpreter for maxima. In
which case, I suspect the fact it is 32-bit will have little effect
unless
I am new to developing Sage, so sorry if I am missing something minor.
I am trying to use a polynomial in X as the kernel, with
R = PolynomialRing(Qt,'X')
X = R.gen()
The error I'm getting is:
TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '+': 'Multivariate
Polynomial Ring in x, y over Rational
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM,
Juanjojuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2:36 pm, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I will be impossible to convince!!!
I have no problem accepting the *compiler* needs -m64. That option
tells the *compiler* to create 64-bit object
On Sep 8, 7:13 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
However, it is done under an assumption (documented with examples)
that arguments of the function are independent for the purpose of
applying chain rule.
An example situation where above assumption is violated, is
Yes, this is a great idea. The benchmarks should be contained in some
sort of database, and, the previous values on the same machine should
be compared to the new values, and significant departures (both
positively and negatively) listed. If performance degrades
significantly on one test, it
On Sep 7, 10:36 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool. I'm not familiar with reddit but the posters don't seem to be
aware that Sage includes some Rubik's cube solvers.
reddit is pretty sage biased. we get a lot of hits from there. not as
many as from wikipedia, but close ;)
h
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:57 AM, J. Cooleyj.a.coo...@warwick.ac.uk wrote:
I am new to developing Sage, so sorry if I am missing something minor.
I am trying to use a polynomial in X as the kernel, with
R = PolynomialRing(Qt,'X')
X = R.gen()
The error I'm getting is:
TypeError: unsupported
On Sep 8, 1:23 pm, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
However, it is done under an assumption (documented with examples)
that arguments of the function are independent for the purpose of
applying chain rule.
An example situation where above assumption is violated, is
sage:
On Sep 8, 9:40 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is what to do when a user explicitly ask to apply chain rule
by over-riding default setting but provides f(x,x) as the function?
Ah, I see. You are applying the wrong chain rule. You need
multivariate calculus.
2009/9/8 Juanjo juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com:
On Sep 8, 2:36 pm, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I will be impossible to convince!!!
I have no problem accepting the *compiler* needs -m64. That option
tells the *compiler* to create 64-bit object files. But once the
linker
Nils Bruin wrote:
On Sep 8, 9:40 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is what to do when a user explicitly ask to apply chain rule
by over-riding default setting but provides f(x,x) as the function?
Ah, I see. You are applying the wrong chain rule. You need
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just kidding. Actually, some paragraphs have been added to
the English version without corresponding changes to the French
version, like the
John H Palmieri wrote:
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just kidding. Actually, some paragraphs have been added to
the English version without corresponding changes to
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just kidding. Actually, some
Hi guys,
hopefully we're getting closer to the root of the misunderstanding(s)
here. Under Mac OS X, things might not be as you expect them to be,
given that gcc (or some version of it) is used. I've tried to help a
bit with libSingular in the past, from there my experience stems from.
Let's
Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
It is very nice that we have in Sage a way to automatically test our
functions through docstrings which, besides, lead us to improve the
documentation How hard could it be to find a similar way to measure
the performance of Sage functions,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Anyone for Sage and the Digital Signature Algorithm? Here's a post on it at
This seems like a good idea to me.
http://amca01.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/the-digital-signature-algorithm-in-maxima-and-sage/
--
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just
It seems impossible to cover all sage functionality with menus, but
they could be helpful when dealing with symbols.
How about popout windows that contain menus? Users could even make
their own menus and call them up as they wished, without effecting the
overall notebook GUI.
Units could be
Hi,
Mike Hansen and I just spent a while carefully going through:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageUsability
and updated it with more ideas...
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:45 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hansen and I just spent a while carefully going through:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageUsability
and updated it with more ideas...
I wonder if it would be totally crazy to consider using reST as the
native
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:45 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hansen and I just spent a while carefully going through:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageUsability
and updated it with more ideas...
I wonder if it would be totally crazy to consider
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:45 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hansen and I just spent a while carefully going through:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageUsability
and updated
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:45 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hansen and I just spent a while carefully going through:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Brian Grangerellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
At the same time, I think it would be big mistake to give up easy
WYSIWYG editing of text cells. Is it easy to convert between HTML and
ReST (both directions)? If so, I think it would be easy to make a text
cell
At the same time, I think it would be big mistake to give up easy
WYSIWYG editing of text cells. Is it easy to convert between HTML and
ReST (both directions)? If so, I think it would be easy to make a text
cell toggleable between TinyMCE and a textbox that would let you put in
ReST.
Yes,
Hi,
I am trying to install sage 4.1.1 from source but the build errors
with the following message,
** Configuration summary for gd 2.0.35:
Support for PNG library: yes
Support for JPEG library: no
Support for Freetype 2.x library: yes
Support for Fontconfig
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Vishnu Boddetinaresh.i...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
make[2]: Entering directory `/afs/ece.cmu.edu/project/kumar/work2/
sage-4.1.2.alpha1/spkg/build/gd-2.0.35.p2/src'
cd . /bin/sh /afs/ece/usr/vboddeti/work2/sage-4.1.2.alpha1/spkg/
On Sep 8, 8:54 pm, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly! What I'd love to have is reST as a native storage format
(so it can be easily edited outside the GUI with emacs) along with a
choice of visual/native editing in the notebook interface. It's just
that in switching from
Hi,
On Sep 9, 12:39 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
make[2]: Entering directory `/afs/ece.cmu.edu/project/kumar/work2/
sage-4.1.2.alpha1/spkg/build/gd-2.0.35.p2/src'
cd . /bin/sh /afs/ece/usr/vboddeti/work2/sage-4.1.2.alpha1/spkg/
Hi there,
I'm writing to ask about a programmatic mechanism for sharing of
notebooks and worksheets. The group I work in is currently
investigating the Sage system (specifically through a fork/branch of
FEMhub) as a mechanism for running analysis on large datasets.
One of our goals, though, is
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Rob Beezergoo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
On Sep 8, 8:54 pm, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
Certainly! What I'd love to have is reST as a native storage format
(so it can be easily edited outside the GUI with emacs) along with a
choice of
On Sep 8, 9:51 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the explanations.
Sphinx can generate jsmath. In fact, we now do just that for the
notebook's docstrings.
Yes, that makes sense now that I think about the new docstring
formatting. And it is good to know that Sphinx can
58 matches
Mail list logo
