On 2/14/12 2:33 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:05:21PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
No. It is really a different poset, see:
...
which returns the original poset. But to_poset gives Q from the above
computation.
Ok; out of curiosity, why do you need the relabelled
Hi Florent,
Thanks for your answer.
I pushed the first framework of the code (some methods are still missing),
but I get some doc-test failures regarding categories which I am not sure
how to fix.
I think the problem is that the elements LinearExtensionsOfPoset are not in
its parent,
but
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote:
I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke
algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over
the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I
gave up and went back to using
This is really funny!
sage: ((-1)**(1/2))**(0.5)
None
sage: ((-1)**(0.5))**(0.5)
0.707106781186548 + 0.707106781186547*I
sage: type(((-1)**(0.5)))
type 'sage.rings.complex_number.ComplexNumber'
sage: type((-1)**(1/2))
type
Yeah, it has to do with how Pynac and Sage recursively call each
other. Certainly a blocker in my book, and it looks like it's been
around a while (possibly since the introduction of Pynac, at least
since we were able to simplify SR(4)^(1/2)). I hope to have a patch up
soon.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012
On 2012-02-14 23:24, entropy wrote:
woohoo! Success as well using
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ MAKE=make -j1 ./sage -f spkg/standard/
gcc-4.6.2.spkg
Successfully installed gcc-4.6.2
Now cleaning up tmp files.
Finished installing gcc-4.6.2.spkg (!!)
Could you do the same with SAGE_CHECK=yes
On 2012-02-15 03:10, John H Palmieri wrote:
Why would it switch over to gcc? Wouldn't this use clang for any spkg
which respects the CC environment variable, regardless of the presence
of SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/gcc?
Currently, I set up #12369 such that it always uses gcc if the GCC spkg
has been
On 2012-02-14 23:57, entropy wrote:
To be clear, after gcc-4.6.2 built and installed, in
order to restart the build process, I simply typed make again in the
sage root directory. Is it necessary to modify this command if one
restarts a build process? Or is my problem that the built process
*bump*
On 2012-02-07 23:57, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Something I did on a long boring train ride: remove some of the Debian
cruft left in the scripts. Please review #12470:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12470
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12511 is now awaiting review.
Thanks, Robert!
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 02/15/2012 12:34 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 02/15/12 05:58 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
A student in my class (Andrey Sarantsev) just pointed out to me that
in Sage-4.8 and Sage-5.0, we have
sage: I^(0.5)
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 21:07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
step...@missouri.edu wrote:
I have a concern over I^(0.5). It is plus or minus (1+I)/sqrt(2). The
difficulty I have is with the plus or minus. It is possible to define the
positive square root of a real number so that
Yes, that is a known error. I have been looking for it for a year.
There is no where in the jmol_lib.js that calls for anything called
JmolApplet. All the applets are numbered and what is actually asked
for is JmolApplet0.jar. It does not seem to affect the functioning of
Jmol. I am assuming
With SAGE_CHECK=yes it does indeed seem to build a broken gcc:
...
checking for long long... yes
checking size of long long... configure: error: in `/Users/jberwald/
src/sage-5.0.beta3-gcc/spkg/build/gcc-4.6.2/gcc-build/gcc':
configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (long long)
See `config.log'
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:55 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM, R. Andrew Ohana
andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
You could also try
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ MAKE=make -j1 ./sage -f spkg/standard/gcc-4.6.2.spkg
One of the main points of the gcc spkg is
On Feb 15, 12:46 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/15/12 12:22 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
On Feb 13, 5:15 am, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Very cool interact (that second one). I fixed the problem. However,
you need to add:
u,v=var('u,v')
On 2/15/12 9:15 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
On Feb 15, 12:46 am, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/15/12 12:22 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
On Feb 13, 5:15 am, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote:
Very cool interact (that second one). I fixed the problem.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12511 is now awaiting
review. Thanks, Robert!
Robert's patch now has positive review and is waiting to be merged.
Thanks to Robert for the quick fix, Keshav and aapitzsch
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:50:52 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
John, entropy, Could you try the following:
$ rm spkg/logs/gcc-4.6.2.log
$ MAKE=make -j1 SAGE_CHECK=yes CFLAGS=-O0 ./sage -f
spkg/standard/gcc-4.6.2.spkg
If it fails, send me spkg/logs/gcc-4.6.2.log
It failed. Log:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this point manual intervention is required. Or was there
something else you were thinking it should do (because clearly you
were
On Feb 15, 1:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this point manual intervention is required. Or was there
something else
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this point manual intervention is required. Or was there
On 2/15/12 12:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this point manual
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/15/12 12:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this point manual intervention is required. Or was there
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 1:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I think at this
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/15/12 12:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It
On Feb 15, 8:38 am, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 21:07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
step...@missouri.edu wrote:
I have a concern over I^(0.5). It is plus or minus (1+I)/sqrt(2). The
difficulty I have is with the plus or minus. It is possible to define
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
expected behavior.
It does always timeout. The regular doctests take 1300 seconds for
sandpile.py! I need to figure out what's going on there.
I
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows, without any Linux virtual machines,
emulators or similar.
I see no reason to reject MinGW, Cygwin, or other
On Feb 13, 10:05 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 9:34:17 PM UTC-8, rjf wrote:
shame on you for turning your back on what is still the
most wide-spread operating system (or family of systems) on home
and office computers.
The most common home
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:32:36 PM UTC-8, rjf wrote:
The number of downloads on windows is about 216,000 since August.
The number of downloads on Linux is about 675.
Many distributions ship with a maxima package, for example Fedora.
Microsoft is not distributing maxima with
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On 02/15/12 01:40 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
While it would be an funny retro-computing exercise,
No, it would be a painful one. Even if you could install it, most modern
software would not run on it.
I don't think Windows
NT 3.51 can run on
On Feb 15, 7:22 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows, without any Linux virtual machines,
emulators or similar.
On 2/15/12 7:10 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
Many distributions ship with a maxima package, for example Fedora.
Microsoft is not distributing maxima with Windows. Hence only windows
users will download maxima from sourceforge.
Not to mention that the sf number doesn't count, for example, Sage
I notice on this ticket[1] that I didn't get emailed about the updated
patch from tmonteil. An updated attachment should work the same as a
comment, right?
Is this something that can be changed? I don't want to lose track of
tickets I'm in the process of reviewing.
[1]
See this incredibly old Trac trac ticket:
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/2259
It looks like even though our version of Trac is pretty old, even
upgrading to the latest Trac might not solve this...
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:59:16 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:50:52 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
John, entropy, Could you try the following:
$ rm spkg/logs/gcc-4.6.2.log
$ MAKE=make -j1 SAGE_CHECK=yes CFLAGS=-O0 ./sage -f
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
You correctly interpreted my response, and I agree with your conclusions. I
haven't used the sage branch-handling code in years.
I used them extensively when
On 02/16/12 01:44 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On 02/15/12 01:40 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
While it would be an funny retro-computing exercise,
No, it would be a painful one. Even if you could install it, most modern
software would not run on it.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
You correctly interpreted my response, and I agree with your conclusions. I
haven't
41 matches
Mail list logo
