[sage-devel] Re: notices article

Nice! I'm one of the "unfortunate mathematicians". Juan Luis Varona -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

[sage-devel] Re: Defining a doctest hook?

Just put the call to your cache cleaning function at the beginning of the docstring. Explicit is better than implicit. On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 1:42:45 PM UTC+2, Simon King wrote: > > Hi! > > Assume that you have a function that does some caching, and the doctests > will only work as

[sage-devel] Re: cohomology of topological spaces

On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 6:48:38 PM UTC+2, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > I believe "git trac checkout" is for retrieving a branch already on the > trac server. > It also creates a new one if there is none yet. The issue is somewhere in authentication, either the trac password is incorrect

[sage-devel] Re: cohomology of topological spaces

> I opened the ticket for twisting in tensor product ( > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21363#ticket) > renaming displayed variables is more on the cosmetic side, should I open > another one just for this? > Yes, it is good to have separate issues on separate tickets (I'm not always so good

[sage-devel] Re: cohomology of topological spaces

Dear Travis, I opened the ticket for twisting in tensor product (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21363#ticket) renaming displayed variables is more on the cosmetic side, should I open another one just for this? git trac checkout 21363 ends in an error: Loading ticket #21363... > Traceback

[sage-devel] Re: Comparison and logarithm on .py vs. interactive

Please see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18970 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

[sage-devel] Re: cohomology of topological spaces

Hey Marek, > > I have two questions regarding cohomology ring of (delta/simplicial) > complexes. > > First: > How to change the way the generators are displayed? > (currently it's h^{i,j}, where i is the degree/gradation and j is the > index of generator in its gradation) > It would be much

[sage-devel] notices article

Jeroen, William, and I have an article about SageMath in the September edition of the Notices of the AMS, which is appearing in mailboxes now: http://www.ams.org/publications/journals/notices/201608/rnoti-p928.pdf --Ursula. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The Sage Wiki

> +1. If anything wiki.sagemath.org should redirect to > trac.sagemath.org/wiki since Trac already provides a (generally nicer, > more powerful) wiki that integrates better with development ;) +1 to merging wiki.sagemath.org into trac.sagemath.org/wiki. Right now there's tendency for duplicated

[sage-devel] Re: cohomology of topological spaces

First: > How to change the way the generators are displayed? > sage: type(H) sage: type(S_2) The code you are interested in can be browsed online here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/tree/master/src/sage/homology For example, this is the line which provides the string representation

[sage-devel] cohomology of topological spaces

Hi, I have two questions regarding cohomology ring of (delta/simplicial) complexes. First: How to change the way the generators are displayed? (currently it's h^{i,j}, where i is the degree/gradation and j is the index of generator in its gradation) It would be much nicer to be able to name

[sage-devel] Defining a doctest hook?

Hi! Assume that you have a function that does some caching, and the doctests will only work as expected if the cache is empty initially. Hence, the execution of the tests in one docstring will affect the execution of the tests in the other docstrings *in the same file*. What I want is either of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The Sage Wiki

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Bruno Grenet wrote: > I am in favor of keeping the wiki on wiki.sagemath.org. My two-cents is that > we should either completely switch Sage's development to github (including > the developers' wiki, etc.) or stay on foo.sagemath.org for

[sage-devel] Re: How to use Sage's doc builder off the source tree

For my optional sage package [1], the last time I spent time building its documentation using Sage, I ended up with these command in my makefile, which calls a sphinx makefile: cd docs && sage -sh -c "make html" cd docs && sage -sh -c "make latexpdf" For now, I am not using sage_autodoc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: dependency on packages typed 'pip'

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:15 PM, leif wrote: > Thierry wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:43:05PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> On 2016-08-26 14:40, Thierry wrote: So, what is the usecase for package typed 'pip' ? >>> >>> It's only a convenient user interface: the