Re: [sage-devel] Re: 9.7.beta8 build error jupyter_jsmol

2022-08-24 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
It also happened to me on one of my system (fedora 36). After removing yarnpkg rpm, it builds ok. (will post the log later...) Kazuyoshi 2022年8月25日(木) 1:28 Samuel Lelievre : > Now tracked at > > - Sage Trac ticket #34421 > Fix timeout in jupyter_jsmol installation >

[sage-devel] Failed to build cysignals-1.10.3 and pyzmq-22.2.1 on a Fedora 35 (x86_64)

2021-11-21 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
Hi, My build of sage-9.5.beta7 on a Fedora 35 system (x86_64) failed: * package: cysignals-1.10.3 last build time: Nov 22 11:13 * package: pyzmq-22.2.1 last build time: Nov 22 11:13 Logs attached to this message. By the way, they've been installed as Fedora packages:

[sage-devel] Singular rpm packages on Fedora

2021-08-18 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
mputations, with special emphasis on commutative and > : non-commutative algebra, algebraic geometry, and > singularity > : theory. > But there exists no fedora.txt file in sage pkgs directory. $ ls build/pkgs/singular/distros/ > conda.txt freebsd.txt macpor

Re: [sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-17 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年8月17日火曜日 18:35:35 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 11:35 Isuru Fernando, wrote: > >> Ah, you are using the system python that was built with gcc, but you want >> to build sage with clang/clang++. >> >> In python, setting CC will override the compiler used for building

Re: [sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-17 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年8月17日火曜日 17:35:47 UTC+9 isu...@gmail.com: > Ah, you are using the system python that was built with gcc, but you want > to build sage with clang/clang++. > > In python, setting CC will override the compiler used for building > extension modules, but > it will not override the linker used

Re: [sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-17 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
will use system package and not install SPKG > python3 What I did was: 1. `git checkout -b ` 2. rsync to a separate directory for building, 3. `make configure` 4. `CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure` 5. `./config.status recheck && ./config.status` 6. `script -c mak

Re: [sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-17 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年8月17日火曜日 13:42:20 UTC+9 Kazuyoshi Furutaka: > > > 2021年8月17日火曜日 13:28:28 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > >> >> >> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 06:50 Kazuyoshi Furutaka, >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> 2021年8月17日(火) 12:41 Dima Pasechnik :

Re: [sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-16 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年8月17日火曜日 13:28:28 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > > > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 06:50 Kazuyoshi Furutaka, > wrote: > >> >> >> 2021年8月17日(火) 12:41 Dima Pasechnik : >> >>> How exactly do you call ./configure? >>> >>> CC=clang CXX=cla

Re: [sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-16 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
and clang++, mixing them up is likely to fail. There's also > an extra complication involving clang's libc++ (its use depends upon your > configuration) > vs gcc's libstdc++ > I did: `./configure CC=clang CXX=clang++` Kazuyoshi > On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 02:15 Kazuyoshi Furutak

[sage-devel] 9.4.rc2, dochtml failed if configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ (gcc was used sometimes?)

2021-08-16 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
Dear sage experts... I'm sorry again for not showing the fix and only to report As the subject says, when configured with CC=clang and CXX=clang++, the build of dochtml failed. > *** > Error building Sage. > > The following

Re: [sage-devel] pari: config file location changed on Fedora

2021-08-08 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
start gp by typing > gp > * at the gp prompt enter > print(default(datadir)) > * and send us the result. > You can use ctrl+d to exist the gp session. > > François > > > On 9/08/2021, at 11:46, Kazuyoshi Furutaka > wrote: > > > > > >

[sage-devel] pari: config file location changed on Fedora

2021-08-08 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
Dear sage experts... I'm sorry not to show the fix and only to report. The location of pari.cfg has been changed recently and `--with-system-pari=no` is in need to configure latest sage (9.4.rc[01]). $ rpm -q --changelog pari|head -3 * Fri Jul 16 2021 Jerry James - 2.13.2-2 - Install the

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-25 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年6月24日木曜日 19:41:12 UTC+9 Kazuyoshi Furutaka: > > 2021年6月24日(木) 18:16 Dima Pasechnik : > >> > The Maxima issue is not yet solved, though... >> You are talking about using gcc to build Sage, right? >> > > Yes. > > > >> At least

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-24 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年6月24日木曜日 19:52:38 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > > What on earth is the GCC included as SPKG in Sage for??? Is it used to > build packages at a later time? > > It includes gfortran, which is not available on macOS from a system. > Before we started a systematic unvendoring process in >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-24 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
ed as SPKG in Sage for??? Is it used to build packages at a later time? Well... Before upgrading to Fedora-34, everything was smooth. (But as I remember it's not so long ago when Sage-GCC was updated to version 10...) Yours, Kazuyoshi -- Kazuyoshi Furutaka -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-24 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
水曜日 19:06:52 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:49 AM Kazuyoshi Furutaka > wrote: > > > > > > > > 2021年6月23日水曜日 17:37:42 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:57 PM Volker Braun > wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-23 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
e 22, 2021 at 11:50:00 PM UTC+2 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, 22:16 Kazuyoshi Furutaka, > wrote: > >>> > >>> On the other hand, build of gcc-10.3 failed. Then, what to do? > >>

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-22 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
 2021年6月23日(水) 7:57 Volker Braun : > I'm running Fedora 34 and 9.4.beta3 builds fine (x86_64). It did compile > the included gcc. > > > > > On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 11:50:00 PM UTC+2 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 22 Jun

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-22 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
On the other hand, build of gcc-10.3 failed. Then, what to do? Kazuyoshi 2021年6月23日(水) 5:40 Dima Pasechnik : > Sage is not yet ready to be built with gcc 11, see > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31786 > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 8:36 PM Kazuyoshi Furutaka > wrote: > >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-22 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年6月23日水曜日 0:06:44 UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:45 PM Kazuyoshi Furutaka > wrote: > [...] > > First of all, I'd like to let you know that on Fedora-34 (x86_64), the > simple build (configured with --prefix only) of prestine gcc-10.3.0 fails &g

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 9.4.beta3 failed to build (gcc-10.3.0)

2021-06-22 Thread Kazuyoshi Furutaka
2021年6月23日(水) 0:06 Dima Pasechnik : > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:45 PM Kazuyoshi Furutaka > wrote: > [...] > > First of all, I'd like to let you know that on Fedora-34 (x86_64), the > simple build (configured with --prefix only) of prestine gcc-10.3.0 fails > without the stat