Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

What are we going to do for the files and other publications? Will those be wiki pages with attachments, or redirect to something else? On Mar 27, 2017 7:16 AM, "Nicolas M. Thiery" wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:11:24PM +0200, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Ok, modulo

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

It makes sense functionally, but I don't see why we should add more pages for the files (combinat.sagemath.org/* redirecting to wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/*) as opposed to only combinat.sagemath.org/index.html redirecting. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Interface with a Complex Dynamics Library

Hi! A lot of SageMath is integrated code. While I don't have the experience to say anything about coding something into Sage, you can browse the git repo for what has been already implemented. This article

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The Sage Wiki

> > > i guess we already discussed about that on > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/sage-devel/$20Organisation$20of$20online$20$3A$20survey$20of$20developers|sort:relevance/sage-devel/vc2lXsjDwYU/2DswQOyNAQAJ Did we reach a conclusion? The plan I outlined still holds.

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

ed > > websites. > > What is "the wiki page"? https://wiki.sagemath.org/ still starts with > a list of upcoming/recent events... > > > > > > Best, > > > > Anne > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 6:14:47

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

Hey, all. It's been awhile since this discussion. Are there any more Combinat people that want these files open, or possibly the subdomain pointing to the SageWiki page? I've changed my mind to support whoever administers the GitHub account to move files on there, as long as there are more

[sage-devel] Re: The Sage Wiki

Hi all. I've messed around with the wiki, too. Check out the expanded frontpage that I've taken to. Thoughts on that while I continue with it? I also have started removing some of the specific SPKG pages in order to keep it all on one wiki.sagemath.org/spkg page. That would help with trying to

[sage-devel] Re: fail to build openblas

"installed" need not be equal to "working" (your log says that you have problems with them, what sort of problems is harder to say) Well, yeah, you're right. I don't think that anything needs to be done in terms of getting other help or doing something about it; thank you (and Steven) for

[sage-devel] Re: fail to build openblas

I have the gcc package installed (along with gcc-c++ and gcc-fortran). Well, I guess that means I'll use the sagemath package in the repos. > > Consider this done...? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group

[sage-devel] Re: fail to build openblas

checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp configure: error: in `/home/mrennekamp/Downloads/sage-7.5.1': configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check See `config.log' for

[sage-devel] fail to build openblas

I downloaded 7.5.1 from source 3x, (2x were git cloning and once from files.sagemath.org), and failed. I can interpret Makefile:123: *** OpenBLAS: Detecting CPU failed. Please set TARGET explicitly, e.g. make TARGET=your_cpu_target. Please read README for the detail.. Stop. , but then I also

[sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

Well, the topic went to documentation very quickly. I think we've all decided that documentation in the source code generally shouldn't be messed with. To exend the statement, we have decided that we should make our directions to new users clearer. If that's all you read, then we should

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

+1 Rosenkilde. If the tutorials really are different from each other, then they should be to the point when introducing which one to read. I also outlined my specific idea for www.sagemath.org in my second post. +1 King. Though it isn't "removing documentation", it is pointing users to 1) how

Re: [sage-devel] Organisation of online : survey of developers

at is your motivation for cleanin up the sage website stuff? What is > your background? > > William > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 8:16 AM Matthew Rennekamp <miste...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Thiery, extremely sorry. I can make the pages that were deleted and >>

Re: [sage-devel] Organisation of online : survey of developers

Thiery, extremely sorry. I can make the pages that were deleted and redirect them to where I moved content. (Eg specifically [[pics]] and [[animate]] to [[art]], noting that [[interact]] has been left alone. As for the links that were on SageForHighSchool, someone must've messed with my computer

[sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

I have no problem doing this, but I'm left to assume that https://github.com/sagemath/documentation is the only way that I can edit it. Otherwise, this post is simply "asking for permission" to do so. On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 8:22:20 PM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote: > > > "Tutorial", "Thematic

[sage-devel] Re: Organisation of online : survey of developers

> Why not? Although I'd agree that a to-do list should better be a metaticket on Trac, and discussions should happen on sage-devel or sage-combinat-devel. The wiki is hard to track down for pages if one doesn't know what to look for. So, for prospective contributors, it's hard to see if a

[sage-devel] Organisation of online : survey of developers

I'm going through the sites that we have and I see a lot of duplicated and outdated information everywhere. So I want to ask what developers think of what is the purpose of various websites should be. So, first would be the wiki. Since it is a Wiki, it is editable by anyone- though it should

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] combinat.sagemath.org

My interest is mostly in website redesign and other changes to make all other relevant information (eg. documentation, wiki, trac stuff, GitHub, social media, etc) coherent to the beginning user (ask for more info in interested). If I can get the files for both / each, that would be great. But

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: combinat.sagemath.org

r up needs to be established, in order to keep navigation intuitive. I say that we should just make a page, sagemath.org/combinat , for now. On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 9:55:18 PM UTC-5, Matthew Rennekamp wrote: > > I'm working on the www.sagemath.org & SageWiki. What happened to >

[sage-combinat-devel] combinat.sagemath.org

I'm working on the www.sagemath.org & SageWiki. What happened to combinat.sagemath.org? Are there other places those files are stored? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving