On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 3:51:29 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
By the way, there is discussion of building Pari under Cygwin 64 on
the pari-dev list; bugs are being discovered and fixed as I type.
Great news!
My last findings were that PARI behaved very badly on Cygwin64.
For example
By the way, there is discussion of building Pari under Cygwin 64 on
the pari-dev list; bugs are being discovered and fixed as I type.
John
On 27 November 2014 at 17:39, Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote:
And I forgot http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17365 and
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 4:02:45 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 3:51:29 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
By the way, there is discussion of building Pari under Cygwin 64 on
the pari-dev list; bugs are being discovered and fixed as I type.
Great news!
Thanks to Travis, only the ATLAS patch needs review!
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17365
http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Ftrac.sagemath.org%2Fticket%2F17365sa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNHvTmGm10lUGkMxeJuWeXDU1cA2Hg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Bumpy bump.
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17365
http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Ftrac.sagemath.org%2Fticket%2F17365sa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNHvTmGm10lUGkMxeJuWeXDU1cA2Hg
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15649
On Thursday, November 27, 2014 6:39:13 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
And I forgot http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17365 and
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15649 which need a little love (and as it
only affects Cygwin should be easy to review, at least if you trust me)!!!
In
We've included dev releases before into Sage, and having closer to
out-of-the-box support for Cygwin64 gets a +1 from me.
Best,
Travis
PS - I should have some time to look again at Cygwin stuff soon.
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:37:33 AM UTC-8, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Thursday,
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:46:56 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote:
The result of the compilation is relocatable? I mean, would it be
eventually possible to have something that windows users just unzip and
runs? Or would they always need to compile it?
I would say so, i dont really know if any
And I forgot http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17365 and
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15649 which need a little love (and as it
only affects Cygwin should be easy to review, at least if you trust me)!!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel
The result of the compilation is relocatable? I mean, would it be
eventually possible to have something that windows users just unzip and
runs? Or would they always need to compile it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To
10 matches
Mail list logo
